Which is more different from the S&P 500, GUNR or URA?

GUNR has 27% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, GUNR or URA?

GUNR charges 0.46% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so GUNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

GUNR vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

GUNR holds 27.1% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and URA 0.0%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GUNR and URA

Net assets: $7.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.

GUNR on its own →URA on its own →

At a glance

27.1%

GUNR in the S&P 500

0.0%

URA in the S&P 500

+26.8%

GUNR total return, 1 year

−31.0%

URA total return, 1 year

GUNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 73% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

27% of GUNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 73% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

URA · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GUNR costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.8 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GUNR vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	GUNR	URA
Return
Measure	GUNR	URA
Total return, 1 year	+26.8%	−31.0%
Drawdown
Measure	GUNR	URA
Below its all-time high	7.5%, high on Sep 9, 2026	62.8%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
Measure	GUNR	URA
What it tracks	Natural resources	Nuclear and uranium
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+15.0%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 46.0 pts
Cost and size
Measure	GUNR	URA
Expense ratio	0.46%	0.69%
Net assets, GUNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and URA as of Oct 12, 2026	$7.2bn	$5.4bn
Holdings
Measure	GUNR	URA
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Window by window

Window by window: GUNR vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	GUNR	URA	GUNR	URA
3 months	+1.3%	−23.8%	not measured	−22.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−2.5%	−43.9%	not measured	−46.5 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+26.8%	−31.0%	not measured	−46.0 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+45.4%	+38.6%	not measured	−39.0 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: GUNR Sep 2011 · URA Nov 2010	+149.3%	−50.9%	not measured	−421.0 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GUNR Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF · Holds 135 stocks in natural resources, 27% of its weight in S&P 500 companies URA Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 57 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Northern Trust Global X

Theme Natural resources Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 27.1% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.3% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.4% 0.0%

Holdings 135 57

Top ten, share of the fund 36.6% 63.0%

Expense ratio 0.46% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +26.8% −31.0%

vs its benchmark not measured −46.0 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −7.5% −62.8%

Net assets, GUNR as of Jul 31, 2026 and URA as of Oct 12, 2026 $7.2bn $5.4bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

GUNR

By weight, 27% of GUNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 135 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +26.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −31.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 46.0 pts. It sits 62.8% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, GUNR or URA?: GUNR has 27% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GUNR or URA?: GUNR charges 0.46% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so GUNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

GUNR vs NLR GUNR vs ARKK GUNR vs QTUM GUNR vs FDN URA vs GNR URA vs ARTY URA vs BOTZ URA vs ARKG

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →GUNR on its own →URA on its own →GUNR dividend history →URA dividend history →URA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

GUNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

GUNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Northern Trust website ↗

URA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

URA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for URA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GUNR against URA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gunr-vs-ura

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.