Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

GNR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GNR returned +32.9% to KWEB's −34.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GNR and KWEB

Net assets: $5.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF, and $4.4bn on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

At a glance
25.9%
GNR in the S&P 500
0.0%
KWEB in the S&P 500
+32.9%
GNR total return, 1 year
−34.0%
KWEB total return, 1 year
GNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 74% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.26%74%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 37% of the fund · 104 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 1% in74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.26%74%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 1% in

26% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

KWEB · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 61% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 9% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 9% in

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GNR costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 66.9 points; GNR is 1.2 times larger.

GNR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureGNRKWEB
Return
Total return, 1 year+32.9%−34.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high6.8%, high on Sep 9, 202671.8%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksNatural resourcesInternet and e-commerce
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.40%0.69%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$5.3bn$4.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36%61%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GNR and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GNR KWEB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GNR
SHELL PLC 5.51%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 5.23%
BHP GROUP LTD 4.44%
NUTRIEN LTD 4.43%
TOTALENERGIES SE 3.68%
CHEVRON CORP 3.00%
UPM KYMMENE OYJ 2.82%
NEWMONT CORP 2.71%
Only in KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.92%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.67%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.55%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.56%
NETEASE INC 6.57%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.92%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.28%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 3.89%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GNR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowGNRKWEB
3 months+1.4%−14.8%
6 months+0.4%−18.3%
1 year+32.9%−34.0%
3 years+50.3%−0.8%
Since launchNot the same days: GNR Sep 2010 · KWEB Aug 2013+138.2%+19.2%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GNR State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF · Holds 104 stocks in natural resources, 26% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Natural resources Internet and e-commerce
In the S&P 500 25.9% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 97.6% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.6% 8.7%
Holdings 104 45
Top ten, share of the fund 36.5% 61.4%
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.69%
Fee for the differing part 0.41% 0.69%
Total return, 1 year +32.9% −34.0%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −6.8% −71.8%
Net assets, GNR as of Nov 3, 2026 and KWEB as of Nov 4, 2026 $5.3bn $4.4bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GNR and KWEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GNR

By weight, 26% of GNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 104 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −34.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 71.8% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do GNR and KWEB hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GNR or KWEB?
GNR has 26% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GNR or KWEB?
GNR charges 0.40% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so GNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GNR against KWEB, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gnr-vs-kweb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.