Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GDXJ vs NIKL: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDXJ returned +21.7% to NIKL's −19.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXJ and NIKL
Net assets: $7.0bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, and $38m on Nov 4, 2026 for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 2, 2026.
0% of NIKL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GDXJ costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.1 points; GDXJ is far larger, $7.0bn against $38m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDXJ | NIKL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +21.7% | −19.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 48.9%, high on Jan 26, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Gold miners | Miners and metals |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 34.2 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +15.0% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 6.7 pts | behind by 34.2 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $7.0bn | $38m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and NIKL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDXJ | NIKL | GDXJ | NIKL |
| 3 months | −4.8% | −25.3% | −3.5 pts vs ACWI | −25.2 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | −15.1% | −40.1% | −17.7 pts vs ACWI | −45.1 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | +21.7% | −19.4% | +6.7 pts vs ACWI | −34.2 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | +210.2% | −27.4% | +132.6 pts vs ACWI | −110.7 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: GDXJ Nov 2009 · NIKL Mar 2023 | +44.7% | −35.6% | not measured | −140.4 pts vs VOO |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 155 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +21.7% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 6.7 pts. It sits 33.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
NIKL
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 73% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −19.4% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 34.2 pts. It sits 48.9% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDXJ and NIKL hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXJ against NIKL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-nikl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GDXJ against NIKL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-nikl
[GDXJ against NIKL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-nikl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.