Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
NIKL vs SGDM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, NIKL returned −19.4% to SGDM's +27.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NIKL and SGDM
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $38m for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF and $617m for Sprott Gold Miners ETF.
0% of NIKL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
8% of SGDM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
Pair scorecard
SGDM costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 47.3 points; SGDM is 16.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | NIKL | SGDM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.4% | +27.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 48.9%, high on Jan 26, 2026 | 25.6%, high on Mar 2, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Miners and metals | Gold miners |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 34.2 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 34.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.46% |
| Net assets | $38m | $617m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NIKL and SGDM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NIKL | SGDM | NIKL | SGDM |
| 3 months | −25.3% | +2.7% | −25.2 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 6 months | −40.1% | −5.9% | −45.1 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 1 year | −19.4% | +27.9% | −34.2 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| 3 years | −27.4% | +198.6% | −110.7 pts vs VOO | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: NIKL Mar 2023 · SGDM Jul 2014 | −35.6% | +219.4% | −140.4 pts vs VOO | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
NIKL
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 73% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −19.4% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 34.2 pts. It sits 48.9% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
SGDM
By weight, 8% of SGDM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 48 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 25.6% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do NIKL and SGDM hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NIKL against SGDM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-sgdm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). NIKL against SGDM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-sgdm
[NIKL against SGDM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-sgdm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.