Data as of .
GDXJ vs SLX: which is really different?
GDXJ and SLX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SLX returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: GDXJ scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and SLX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in GDXJ | Only in SLX |
|---|---|
| Coeur Mining Inc 6.84% | Rio Tinto Plc 7.08% |
| Alamos Gold Inc 6.53% | Bhp Group Ltd 7.05% |
| Equinox Gold Corp 6.04% | Vale Sa 6.74% |
| Endeavour Mining Plc 5.64% | Nucor Corp 6.55% |
| Iamgold Corp 5.14% | Arcelormittal Sa 5.91% |
| Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv 2.59% | Steel Dynamics Inc 5.12% |
| Hecla Mining Co 2.43% | Rio Tinto Ltd 4.74% |
| First Majestic Silver Corp 2.39% | Nippon Steel Corp 4.72% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDXJ | SLX | GDXJ | SLX | GDXJ | SLX | |
| 3 months | +16.1% | +0.7% | +13.8 pts | −1.6 pts | +18.5 pts | +3.2 pts |
| 6 months | +18.8% | +23.8% | +0.7 pts | +5.8 pts | −5.5 pts | −0.5 pts |
| 1 year | +45.2% | +48.9% | +28.7 pts | +32.3 pts | +23.5 pts | +27.1 pts |
| 3 years | +274.9% | +72.2% | +196.5 pts | −6.2 pts | +176.7 pts | −25.9 pts |
| Since launch | +64.0% | +176.7% | −739.5 pts | −626.8 pts | −1626.2 pts | −1513.5 pts |
| GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF Holds 157 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SLX VanEck Steel ETF Holds 39 stocks in miners and metals, 12% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VanEck | VanEck |
| Theme | Gold miners | Miners and metals |
| In the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 12.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 99.9% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 157 | 39 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 41.6% | 58.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.52% | 0.55% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.52% | 0.55% |
| Total return, 1 year | +45.2% | +48.9% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +28.7 pts | +32.3 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +23.5 pts | +27.1 pts |
| Below its high | −20.3% | −6.6% |
| Net assets | $9.2bn | $167m |
GDXJ in plain words
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 157 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +45.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.7 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
SLX in plain words
By weight, 12% of SLX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 39 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +48.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 32.3 pts. It sits 6.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GDXJ and SLX hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDXJ or SLX?
- GDXJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SLX has 12%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, GDXJ or SLX?
- GDXJ charges 0.52% a year and SLX charges 0.55%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDXJ against SLX, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-slx Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.