Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
NIKL vs RING: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, NIKL returned −19.4% to RING's +28.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about NIKL and RING
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $38m for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF and $2.3bn for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF.
0% of NIKL's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 4, 2026.
18% of RING's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 82% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
RING costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 47.8 points; RING is far larger, $2.3bn against $38m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | NIKL | RING |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.4% | +28.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 48.9%, high on Jan 26, 2026 | 25.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Miners and metals | Gold miners |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 34.2 pts | |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +15.0% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 34.2 pts | ahead by 13.4 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Net assets | $38m | $2.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, NIKL and RING hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NIKL | RING | NIKL | RING |
| 3 months | −25.3% | +2.4% | −25.2 pts vs VOO | +3.7 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | −40.1% | −7.2% | −45.1 pts vs VOO | −9.8 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | −19.4% | +28.4% | −34.2 pts vs VOO | +13.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | −27.4% | +233.8% | −110.7 pts vs VOO | +156.2 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: NIKL Mar 2023 · RING Feb 2012 | −35.6% | +74.0% | −140.4 pts vs VOO | −293.7 pts vs ACWI |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
NIKL
By weight, 0% of NIKL's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 73% of the fund across 26 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 4, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −19.4% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 34.2 pts. It sits 48.9% below its all-time high of Jan 26, 2026.
RING
By weight, 18% of RING's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 13.4 pts. It sits 25.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do NIKL and RING hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, NIKL against RING, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-ring
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). NIKL against RING. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-ring
[NIKL against RING (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nikl-vs-ring)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.