GAMR vs GGME: which is really different?

GAMR and GGME hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and GAMR returned +3.6% over the year. Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF.

44.4%
GAMR in the S&P 500
55.4%
GGME in the S&P 500
+3.6%
GAMR total return, 1 year
+2.0%
GGME total return, 1 year
GAMR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202656% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
56% of its weight is outside the S&P 50044% of GAMR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index44%56%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 85% · top ten 71% of the fund · 25 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 44% in56% of its weight is outside the S&P 50044% of GAMR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index44%56%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 85% · top ten 71% of the fund

44% of GAMR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 56% is outside the index

GGME · 1 year to Sep 30, 202645% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
45% of its weight is outside the S&P 50055% of GGME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index55%45%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 82% · top ten 64% of the fund · 108 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 55% in45% of its weight is outside the S&P 50055% of GGME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index55%45%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 82% · top ten 64% of the fund

55% of GGME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · GAMR scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GAMR and GGME hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

41% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding GAMR GGME
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 9.49% 9.47%
Meta Platforms Inc 9.44% 8.77%
NVIDIA Corp 9.33% 8.16%
Nintendo Co Ltd 4.67% 3.52%
NETEASE INC 4.59% 2.25%
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 2.29% 2.23%
ROBLOX Corp 2.27% 1.72%
Aristocrat Leisure Ltd 2.32% 1.49%
Unity Software Inc 2.34% 0.92%
Konami Group Corp 2.49% 0.76%
Capcom Co Ltd 2.42% 0.50%
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12/31/2031 5.76% 0.43%
Only in GAMR
Microsoft Corp 9.40%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 9.19%
Sony Group Corp 4.70%
AppLovin Corp 4.43%
Sea Ltd 4.34%
International Games System Co Ltd 2.66%
Bandai Namco Holdings Inc 2.57%
Asustek Computer Inc 2.28%
Only in GGME
Apple Inc 7.95%
Netflix Inc 7.13%
Cloudflare Inc 4.89%
QUALCOMM Inc 4.56%
MediaTek Inc 4.52%
Adobe Inc 4.23%
Spotify Technology SA 4.09%
Autodesk Inc 2.62%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

41% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowGAMRGGMEGAMRGGMEGAMRGGME
3 months+8.4%+7.8%+5.9 pts+5.3 pts+6.3 pts+5.7 pts
6 months+31.7%+28.1%+14.7 pts+11.1 pts+4.8 pts+1.2 pts
1 year+3.6%+2.0%−12.1 pts−13.7 pts−20.2 pts−21.8 pts
3 years+88.4%+102.9%+3.4 pts+18.0 pts−21.6 pts−7.0 pts
Since launch
GAMR Mar 2016 · GGME Jan 2010
+299.4%+514.5%−55.4 pts−290.1 pts−364.2 pts−1223.0 pts

GAMR and GGME over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

GAMR
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF · Holds 25 stocks in gaming, esports and betting, 44% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
GGME
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF · Holds 108 stocks in gaming, esports and betting, 55% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Amplify Invesco
Theme Gaming, esports and betting Gaming, esports and betting
In the S&P 500 44.4% 55.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 84.5% 81.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 44.4% 55.1%
Holdings 25 108
Top ten, share of the fund 71.0% 63.8%
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.63%
Fee for the differing part 0.70% 0.77%
Total return, 1 year +3.6% +2.0%
vs the S&P 500 −12.1 pts −13.7 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −20.2 pts −21.8 pts
Below its high −8.4% −3.3%
Net assets $41m $45m

GAMR and GGME on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

GAMR in plain words

By weight, 44% of GAMR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 84%. The top ten holdings are 71% of the fund across 25 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. It sits 8.4% below its all-time high of Jan 27, 2021.

GGME in plain words

By weight, 55% of GGME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.7 pts.

Questions people ask

Do GAMR and GGME hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 41% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GAMR or GGME?
GAMR has 44% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GGME has 55%, so GAMR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GAMR or GGME?
GAMR charges 0.59% a year and GGME charges 0.63%, so GAMR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, GAMR against GGME, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gamr-vs-ggme

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.