BETZ vs GGME: which is really different?
BETZ and GGME hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and GGME returned +2.0% over the year. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF.
0% of BETZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index
55% of GGME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index
A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BETZ and GGME hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
1% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
1% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BETZ | GGME | BETZ | GGME | BETZ | GGME |
| 3 months | −14.3% | +7.8% | −16.8 pts | +5.3 pts | −16.4 pts | +5.7 pts |
| 6 months | −10.5% | +28.1% | −27.5 pts | +11.1 pts | −37.4 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 1 year | −28.8% | +2.0% | −44.5 pts | −13.7 pts | −52.6 pts | −21.8 pts |
| 3 years | +8.0% | +102.9% | −76.9 pts | +18.0 pts | −101.9 pts | −7.0 pts |
| Since launch BETZ Jun 2020 · GGME Jan 2010 | +7.1% | +514.5% | −160.8 pts | −290.1 pts | −219.9 pts | −1223.0 pts |
BETZ and GGME over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
BETZ and GGME on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BETZ in plain words
By weight, 0% of BETZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 23 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −28.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 44.5 pts. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Apr 27, 2021.
GGME in plain words
By weight, 55% of GGME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 82%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.7 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do BETZ and GGME hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, BETZ against GGME, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/betz-vs-ggme
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BETZ against GGME, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/betz-vs-ggme Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, BETZ against GGME, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/betz-vs-ggme
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). BETZ against GGME. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/betz-vs-ggme
- Markdown
- [BETZ against GGME (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/betz-vs-ggme)