GALX vs MARS: which is really different?

GALX and MARS hold 28% of their weight in the same names. VistaShares Space Supercycle ETF and Roundhill Space & Technology ETF.

13.5%
GALX in the S&P 500
0.0%
MARS in the S&P 500
−1.9%
GALX total return, since launch
+1.4%
MARS total return, since launch
GALX · since launch to Sep 30, 202687% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50014% of GALX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index14%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 36% of the fund · 59 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50014% of GALX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index14%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 36% of the fund

14% of GALX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index

MARS · 6 months to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 29 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund

0% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · MARS scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GALX and MARS hold 28% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

28% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding GALX MARS
Rocket Lab Corp 4.25% 10.05%
MDA Space Ltd 3.87% 3.27%
AST SpaceMobile Inc 2.98% 7.02%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 2.83% 24.39%
Firefly Aerospace Inc 2.24% 3.13%
Avio SpA 3.33% 1.93%
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd 2.93% 1.32%
Redwire Corp 1.15% 2.26%
Viasat Inc 1.07% 4.69%
York Space Systems Inc 1.07% 1.57%
Intuitive Machines Inc 1.02% 2.67%
Astroscale Holdings Inc 1.00% 1.76%
Only in GALX
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc 4.35%
AMETEK Inc 4.00%
Moog Inc 3.66%
Frequency Electronics Inc 3.50%
Teledyne Technologies Inc 3.18%
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA 3.03%
5N Plus Inc 3.01%
Filtronic PLC 2.99%
Only in MARS
Globalstar Inc 5.07%
Planet Labs PBC 3.63%
Iridium Communications Inc 3.45%
OHB SE 3.21%
SKY Perfect JSAT Corp 2.91%
Eutelsat Communications SACA 2.13%
SES SA 2.04%
Synspective Inc 1.68%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

28% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowGALXMARSGALXMARSGALXMARS
3 monthsnot published−19.7%not published−22.2 ptsnot published−21.8 pts
6 monthsnot published−5.6%not published−22.6 ptsnot published−32.5 pts
Since launch
GALX Jul 2026 · MARS Mar 2026
−1.9%+1.4%−3.7 pts−11.4 pts−6.8 pts−20.5 pts

GALX and MARS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

GALX
VistaShares Space Supercycle ETF · Holds 59 stocks in space, 14% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF · Holds 29 stocks in space, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer VistaShares Roundhill
Theme Space Space
In the S&P 500 13.5% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 59 29
Top ten, share of the fund 36.2% 67.9%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.76% 0.75%
Total return, 1 year −1.9% (since launch on Jul 16, 2026) +1.4% (since launch on Mar 5, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −3.7 pts −11.4 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −6.8 pts −20.5 pts
Below its high −13.0% −44.9%
Net assets $3m $46m

GALX and MARS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

GALX in plain words

By weight, 14% of GALX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jul 16, 2026 the fund returned −1.9% with distributions reinvested against +1.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 3.7 pts. It sits 13.0% below its all-time high of Aug 12, 2026.

MARS in plain words

By weight, 0% of MARS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 29 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Mar 5, 2026 the fund returned +1.4% with distributions reinvested against +12.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. It sits 44.9% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GALX and MARS hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 28% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GALX or MARS?
GALX has 14% of its weight in S&P 500 names and MARS has 0%, so MARS differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GALX or MARS?
GALX charges 0.75% a year and MARS charges 0.75%, so GALX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, GALX against MARS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/galx-vs-mars

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.