MARS vs ORBX: which is really different?

MARS and ORBX hold 82% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Space & Technology ETF and Global X Space Tech ETF.

0.0%
MARS in the S&P 500
0.0%
ORBX in the S&P 500
+1.4%
MARS total return, since launch
−19.6%
ORBX total return, since launch
MARS · 6 months to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 29 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund

0% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ORBX · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of ORBX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund · 38 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of ORBX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund

0% of ORBX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · MARS scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MARS and ORBX hold 82% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

82% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MARS ORBX
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 24.39% 22.74%
Rocket Lab Corp 10.05% 10.37%
AST SpaceMobile Inc 7.02% 9.60%
Globalstar Inc 5.07% 4.62%
Viasat Inc 4.69% 4.45%
Planet Labs PBC 3.63% 3.48%
Iridium Communications Inc 3.45% 4.64%
MDA Space Ltd 3.27% 4.57%
Firefly Aerospace Inc 3.13% 4.35%
Intuitive Machines Inc 2.67% 3.91%
Redwire Corp 2.26% 4.20%
Avio SpA 1.93% 2.19%
Only in MARS
SKY Perfect JSAT Corp 2.91%
Eutelsat Communications SACA 2.13%
SES SA 2.04%
Voyager Technologies Inc 1.82%
Seraphim Space Investment Trust PLC 1.32%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.48%
Only in ORBX
SES 2.63%
EUTELSAT COMMUNICATIONS 1.88%
FILTRONIC PLC 1.00%
VIRGIN GALACTIC HOLDINGS INC 0.82%
CREOTECH INSTRUMENTS SA 0.71%
INTELLIAN TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.65%
OVZON AB 0.57%
ISPACE INC/JAPAN 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

82% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowMARSORBXMARSORBXMARSORBX
3 months−19.7%−21.5%−22.2 pts−24.0 pts−21.8 pts−23.6 pts
6 months−5.6%not published−22.6 ptsnot published−32.5 ptsnot published
Since launch
MARS Mar 2026 · ORBX Apr 2026
+1.4%−19.6%−11.4 pts−29.2 pts−20.5 pts−36.0 pts

MARS and ORBX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF · Holds 29 stocks in space, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ORBX
Global X Space Tech ETF · Holds 38 stocks in space, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Roundhill Global X
Theme Space Space
In the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 29 38
Top ten, share of the fund 67.9% 73.5%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.50%
Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.50%
Total return, 1 year +1.4% (since launch on Mar 5, 2026) −19.6% (since launch on Apr 15, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −11.4 pts −29.2 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −20.5 pts −36.0 pts
Below its high −44.9% −46.4%
Net assets $46m $41m

MARS and ORBX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MARS in plain words

By weight, 0% of MARS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 29 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Mar 5, 2026 the fund returned +1.4% with distributions reinvested against +12.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. It sits 44.9% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

ORBX in plain words

By weight, 0% of ORBX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested against +9.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 29.2 pts. It sits 46.4% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do MARS and ORBX hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 82% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is close to holding one of them twice. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, MARS or ORBX?
MARS has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ORBX has 0%, so MARS differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, MARS or ORBX?
MARS charges 0.75% a year and ORBX charges 0.50%, so ORBX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MARS against ORBX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/mars-vs-orbx

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.