ORBX vs UFO: which is really different?

ORBX and UFO hold 44% of their weight in the same names. Global X Space Tech ETF and Procure Space ETF.

0.0%
ORBX in the S&P 500
35.9%
UFO in the S&P 500
−19.6%
ORBX total return, since launch
+19.0%
UFO total return, 1 year
ORBX · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of ORBX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund · 38 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of ORBX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 74% of the fund

0% of ORBX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

UFO · 1 year to Sep 30, 202664% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
64% of its weight is outside the S&P 50036% of UFO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index36%64%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 49% of the fund · 64 holdings filed Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 1% in64% of its weight is outside the S&P 50036% of UFO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index36%64%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 49% of the fund

36% of UFO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ORBX scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ORBX and UFO hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

44% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ORBX UFO
ROCKET LAB CORP 10.37% 5.06%
GLOBALSTAR INC 4.62% 5.32%
IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC 4.64% 4.53%
VIASAT INC 4.45% 5.94%
MDA SPACE LTD 4.57% 4.13%
FIREFLY AEROSPACE INC 4.35% 3.90%
AST SPACEMOBILE INC 9.60% 3.56%
INTUITIVE MACHINES INC 3.91% 3.48%
PLANET LABS PBC 3.48% 6.21%
BLACKSKY TECHNOLOGY INC 1.43% 1.33%
AVIO SPA 2.19% 1.30%
GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD 1.16% 1.29%
Only in ORBX
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 22.74%
SES 2.63%
EUTELSAT COMMUNICATIONS 1.88%
YORK SPACE SYSTEMS INC 1.38%
FILTRONIC PLC 1.00%
OHB SE 0.92%
CREOTECH INSTRUMENTS SA 0.71%
SATREC INITIATIVE CO LTD 0.60%
Only in UFO
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 5.08%
EchoStar Corp 4.79%
Garmin Ltd 4.46%
Trimble Inc 4.27%
SES SA 4.03%
SKY Perfect JSAT Corp 3.52%
Boeing Co/The 2.35%
Airbus SE 2.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

44% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowORBXUFOORBXUFOORBXUFO
3 months−21.5%−15.7%−24.0 pts−18.2 pts−23.6 pts−17.8 pts
6 monthsnot published−8.4%not published−25.4 ptsnot published−35.3 pts
1 yearnot published+19.0%not published+3.3 ptsnot published−4.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+160.4%not published+75.5 ptsnot published+50.5 pts
Since launch
ORBX Apr 2026 · UFO Apr 2019
−19.6%+86.5%−29.2 pts−108.9 pts−36.0 pts−232.4 pts

ORBX and UFO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ORBX
Global X Space Tech ETF · Holds 38 stocks in space, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
UFO
Procure Space ETF · Holds 64 stocks in space, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Global X Procure
Theme Space Space
In the S&P 500 0.0% 35.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 98.6%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 1.1%
Holdings 38 64
Top ten, share of the fund 73.5% 48.5%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.50% 0.76%
Total return, 1 year −19.6% (since launch on Apr 15, 2026) +19.0%
vs the S&P 500 −29.2 pts +3.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −36.0 pts −4.8 pts
Below its high −46.4% −37.5%
Net assets $41m $587m

ORBX and UFO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ORBX in plain words

By weight, 0% of ORBX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 74% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 15, 2026 the fund returned −19.6% with distributions reinvested against +9.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 29.2 pts. It sits 46.4% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

UFO in plain words

By weight, 36% of UFO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.3 pts. It sits 37.5% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ORBX and UFO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 44% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ORBX or UFO?
ORBX has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UFO has 36%, so ORBX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ORBX or UFO?
ORBX charges 0.50% a year and UFO charges 0.75%, so ORBX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ORBX against UFO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/orbx-vs-ufo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.