MARS vs UFO: which is really different?

MARS and UFO hold 46% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Space & Technology ETF and Procure Space ETF.

0.0%
MARS in the S&P 500
35.9%
UFO in the S&P 500
+1.4%
MARS total return, since launch
+19.0%
UFO total return, 1 year
MARS · 6 months to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund · 29 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 68% of the fund

0% of MARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

UFO · 1 year to Sep 30, 202664% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
64% of its weight is outside the S&P 50036% of UFO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index36%64%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 49% of the fund · 64 holdings filed Jul 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 1% in64% of its weight is outside the S&P 50036% of UFO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index36%64%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 49% of the fund

36% of UFO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · MARS scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MARS and UFO hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

46% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MARS UFO
Globalstar Inc 5.07% 5.32%
Rocket Lab Corp 10.05% 5.06%
Viasat Inc 4.69% 5.94%
Planet Labs PBC 3.63% 6.21%
AST SpaceMobile Inc 7.02% 3.56%
Iridium Communications Inc 3.45% 4.53%
MDA Space Ltd 3.27% 4.13%
Firefly Aerospace Inc 3.13% 3.90%
SKY Perfect JSAT Corp 2.91% 3.52%
Intuitive Machines Inc 2.67% 3.48%
SES SA 2.04% 4.03%
Voyager Technologies Inc 1.82% 1.72%
Only in MARS
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 24.39%
OHB SE 3.21%
York Space Systems Inc 1.57%
Seraphim Space Investment Trust PLC 1.32%
Satrec Initiative Co Ltd 1.19%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.48%
Only in UFO
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 5.08%
EchoStar Corp 4.79%
Garmin Ltd 4.46%
Trimble Inc 4.27%
Boeing Co/The 2.35%
Airbus SE 2.17%
Honeywell International Inc 1.93%
L3Harris Technologies Inc 1.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

46% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowMARSUFOMARSUFOMARSUFO
3 months−19.7%−15.7%−22.2 pts−18.2 pts−21.8 pts−17.8 pts
6 months−5.6%−8.4%−22.6 pts−25.4 pts−32.5 pts−35.3 pts
1 yearnot published+19.0%not published+3.3 ptsnot published−4.8 pts
3 yearsnot published+160.4%not published+75.5 ptsnot published+50.5 pts
Since launch
MARS Mar 2026 · UFO Apr 2019
+1.4%+86.5%−11.4 pts−108.9 pts−20.5 pts−232.4 pts

MARS and UFO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF · Holds 29 stocks in space, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
UFO
Procure Space ETF · Holds 64 stocks in space, 36% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Roundhill Procure
Theme Space Space
In the S&P 500 0.0% 35.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 98.6%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 1.1%
Holdings 29 64
Top ten, share of the fund 67.9% 48.5%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.76%
Total return, 1 year +1.4% (since launch on Mar 5, 2026) +19.0%
vs the S&P 500 −11.4 pts +3.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −20.5 pts −4.8 pts
Below its high −44.9% −37.5%
Net assets $46m $587m

MARS and UFO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MARS in plain words

By weight, 0% of MARS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 68% of the fund across 29 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Mar 5, 2026 the fund returned +1.4% with distributions reinvested against +12.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.4 pts. It sits 44.9% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

UFO in plain words

By weight, 36% of UFO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 64 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 3.3 pts. It sits 37.5% below its all-time high of May 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do MARS and UFO hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 46% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, MARS or UFO?
MARS has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and UFO has 36%, so MARS differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, MARS or UFO?
MARS charges 0.75% a year and UFO charges 0.75%, so MARS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, MARS against UFO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/mars-vs-ufo

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.