Do FCLD and IGV hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, FCLD or IGV?

FCLD has 51% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 81%, so IGV differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, FCLD or IGV?

FCLD charges 0.39% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

FCLD vs IGV: which is really different?

FCLD and IGV hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and FCLD returned +53.2% over the year. Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF.

51.1%

FCLD in the S&P 500

80.7%

IGV in the S&P 500

+53.2%

FCLD total return, 1 year

−7.4%

IGV total return, 1 year

FCLD · 1 year to Sep 30, 202649% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

51% of FCLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 49% is outside the index

IGV · 1 year to Sep 30, 202619% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

81% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · IGV scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

FCLD 25.3

IGV 26.8

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FCLD and IGV hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

25% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FCLD IGV

DYNATRACE INC 1.83% 0.58%

LIVERAMP HOLDINGS INC 0.98% 0.08%

Only in FCLD

SANDISK CORP/DE 6.16%

WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 5.29%

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 4.97%

APPLOVIN CORP 4.33%

MICROSOFT CORP 4.15%

SALESFORCE INC 3.96%

EQUINIX INC 3.90%

DATADOG INC 3.88%

Only in IGV

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 9.66%

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 8.99%

CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.87%

MICROSOFT 8.50%

ORACLE 6.92%

SERVICENOW 4.41%

SALESFORCE 4.06%

FORTINET 3.82%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

25% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	FCLD	IGV	FCLD	IGV	FCLD	IGV
3 months	+14.5%	+14.1%	+12.0 pts	+11.6 pts	+12.4 pts	+12.0 pts
6 months	+62.1%	+33.5%	+45.1 pts	+16.5 pts	+35.2 pts	+6.6 pts
1 year	+53.2%	−7.4%	+37.5 pts	−23.1 pts	+29.4 pts	−31.2 pts
3 years	+136.3%	+56.0%	+51.3 pts	−28.9 pts	+26.3 pts	−53.9 pts
Since launch FCLD Oct 2021 · IGV Jan 2010	+75.9%	+1052.2%	−10.0 pts	+247.5 pts	−34.0 pts	−685.4 pts

FCLD and IGV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

FCLD

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF · Holds 50 stocks in cloud and software, 51% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

IGV

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 111 stocks in cloud and software, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Fidelity iShares

Theme Cloud and software Cloud and software

In the S&P 500 51.1% 80.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 91.6% 92.4%

In the Nasdaq-100 32.9% 65.7%

Holdings 50 111

Top ten, share of the fund 44.1% 61.7%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.38%

Fee for the differing part 0.43% 0.41%

Total return, 1 year +53.2% −7.4%

vs the S&P 500 +37.5 pts −23.1 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +29.4 pts −31.2 pts

Below its high −1.5% −9.6%

Net assets $145m $13.9bn

FCLD and IGV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FCLD in plain words

By weight, 51% of FCLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +53.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 37.5 pts.

IGV in plain words

By weight, 81% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 111 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −7.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 23.1 pts. It sits 9.6% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do FCLD and IGV hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FCLD or IGV?: FCLD has 51% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 81%, so IGV differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FCLD or IGV?: FCLD charges 0.39% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FCLD vs SKYY FCLD vs WCLD FCLD vs XIGV FCLD vs XSW IGV vs SIL IGV vs SMH IGV vs SOXX IGV vs URA

FCLD on its own →IGV on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FCLD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FCLD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Fidelity website ↗IGV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IGV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IGV ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FCLD against IGV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fcld-vs-igv

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.