Do FCLD and XIGV hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, FCLD or XIGV?

FCLD has 51% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XIGV has 90%, so FCLD differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, FCLD or XIGV?

FCLD charges 0.39% a year and XIGV charges 0.65%, so FCLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

FCLD vs XIGV: which is really different?

FCLD and XIGV hold 4% of their weight in the same names. Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF and Defiance US 100 Tech Ex Software ETF.

51.1%

FCLD in the S&P 500

90.5%

XIGV in the S&P 500

+53.2%

FCLD total return, 1 year

−2.1%

XIGV total return, since launch

FCLD · 1 year to Sep 30, 202649% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

51% of FCLD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 49% is outside the index

XIGV · 3 months to Sep 30, 202610% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

91% of XIGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 10% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · FCLD scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

FCLD 25.3

XIGV 0.9

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FCLD and XIGV hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

4% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding FCLD XIGV

AMAZON.COM INC 1.99% 4.73%

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 4.97% 1.14%

WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 5.29% 0.94%

Only in FCLD

SANDISK CORP/DE 6.16%

APPLOVIN CORP 4.33%

MICROSOFT CORP 4.15%

SALESFORCE INC 3.96%

EQUINIX INC 3.90%

DATADOG INC 3.88%

SNOWFLAKE INC 3.85%

SERVICENOW INC 3.61%

Only in XIGV

Advanced Micro Devices Inc 6.06%

Meta Platforms Inc 5.69%

Micron Technology Inc 5.27%

Apple Inc 5.22%

Nvidia Corp 5.18%

Space Exploration Technologies Corp 4.73%

Alphabet Inc 4.40%

Broadcom Inc 4.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

4% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	FCLD	XIGV	FCLD	XIGV	FCLD	XIGV
3 months	+14.5%	−1.9%	+12.0 pts	−4.4 pts	+12.4 pts	−4.0 pts
6 months	+62.1%	not published	+45.1 pts	not published	+35.2 pts	not published
1 year	+53.2%	not published	+37.5 pts	not published	+29.4 pts	not published
3 years	+136.3%	not published	+51.3 pts	not published	+26.3 pts	not published
Since launch FCLD Oct 2021 · XIGV Jun 2026	+75.9%	−2.1%	−10.0 pts	−5.3 pts	−34.0 pts	−4.4 pts

FCLD and XIGV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

FCLD

Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF · Holds 50 stocks in cloud and software, 51% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

XIGV

Defiance US 100 Tech Ex Software ETF · Holds 79 stocks in cloud and software, 90% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Fidelity Defiance

Theme Cloud and software Cloud and software

In the S&P 500 51.1% 90.5%

Active share vs the S&P 500 91.6% 60.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 32.9% 94.4%

Holdings 50 79

Top ten, share of the fund 44.1% 49.9%

Expense ratio 0.39% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.43% 1.07%

Total return, 1 year +53.2% −2.1% (since launch on Jun 29, 2026)

vs the S&P 500 +37.5 pts −5.3 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +29.4 pts −4.4 pts

Below its high −1.5% −4.0%

Net assets $145m $242,313

FCLD and XIGV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

FCLD in plain words

By weight, 51% of FCLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 50 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +53.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 37.5 pts.

XIGV in plain words

By weight, 90% of XIGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 61%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 79 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Jun 29, 2026 the fund returned −2.1% with distributions reinvested against +3.2% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts.

Questions people ask

Do FCLD and XIGV hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FCLD or XIGV?: FCLD has 51% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XIGV has 90%, so FCLD differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FCLD or XIGV?: FCLD charges 0.39% a year and XIGV charges 0.65%, so FCLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FCLD vs IGV FCLD vs SKYY FCLD vs WCLD FCLD vs XSW XIGV vs IGV XIGV vs XSW XIGV vs CLOD XIGV vs SKYY

FCLD on its own →XIGV on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

FCLD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗FCLD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Fidelity website ↗XIGV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗XIGV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Defiance page for XIGV ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, FCLD against XIGV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fcld-vs-xigv

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.