IGV vs XSW: which is really different?

IGV and XSW hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and XSW returned −1.6% over the year. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Software & Services ETF.

80.7%
IGV in the S&P 500
20.8%
XSW in the S&P 500
−7.4%
IGV total return, 1 year
−1.6%
XSW total return, 1 year
IGV · 1 year to Sep 30, 202619% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index81%19%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 62% of the fund · 111 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 66% in19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index81%19%in the S&P 50019% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 62% of the fund

81% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index

XSW · 1 year to Sep 30, 202679% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
79% of its weight is outside the S&P 50021% of XSW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index21%79%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 9% of the fund · 133 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 14% in79% of its weight is outside the S&P 50021% of XSW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index21%79%inoutside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 9% of the fund

21% of XSW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 79% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · XSW scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGV and XSW hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

33% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IGV XSW
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.87% 0.97%
DATADOG INC CLASS A 3.18% 0.93%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 9.66% 0.90%
CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS 3.15% 0.89%
STRATEGY INC CLASS A 1.93% 0.88%
FORTINET 3.82% 0.87%
SYNOPSYS 2.88% 0.84%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 8.99% 0.84%
MICROSOFT 8.50% 0.80%
WORKDAY CLASS A 1.33% 0.78%
SERVICENOW 4.41% 0.78%
AUTODESK 1.53% 0.77%
Only in IGV
APPLOVIN CLASS A 2.73%
DESCARTES SYSTEMS GROUP 0.24%
SNAP INC CLASS A 0.21%
OPEN TEXT 0.19%
BLACKBERRY 0.18%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.05%
LIGHTSPEED COMMERCE 0.04%
CASH COLLATERAL USD WFFUT 0.00%
Only in XSW
NETSKOPE INC CL A 0.92%
VIA TRANSPORTATION INC CL A 0.89%
SAILPOINT INC 0.88%
RAPID7 INC 0.88%
AMPLITUDE INC CLASS A 0.85%
ONESPAN INC 0.85%
F5 INC 0.84%
GARTNER INC 0.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

33% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowIGVXSWIGVXSWIGVXSW
3 months+14.1%+10.1%+11.6 pts+7.5 pts+12.0 pts+7.9 pts
6 months+33.5%+36.3%+16.5 pts+19.3 pts+6.6 pts+9.4 pts
1 year−7.4%−1.6%−23.1 pts−17.3 pts−31.2 pts−25.4 pts
3 years+56.0%+53.6%−28.9 pts−31.4 pts−53.9 pts−56.4 pts
Since launch
IGV Jan 2010 · XSW Sep 2011
+1052.2%+766.5%+247.5 pts+12.4 pts−685.4 pts−696.5 pts

IGV and XSW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 111 stocks in cloud and software, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
XSW
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Software & Services ETF · Holds 133 stocks in cloud and software, 21% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer iShares State Street
Theme Cloud and software Cloud and software
In the S&P 500 80.7% 20.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 92.4% 95.5%
In the Nasdaq-100 65.7% 14.0%
Holdings 111 133
Top ten, share of the fund 61.7% 9.2%
Expense ratio 0.38% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.41% 0.37%
Total return, 1 year −7.4% −1.6%
vs the S&P 500 −23.1 pts −17.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −31.2 pts −25.4 pts
Below its high −9.6% −7.5%
Net assets $13.9bn $473m

IGV and XSW on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IGV in plain words

By weight, 81% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 111 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −7.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 23.1 pts. It sits 9.6% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.

XSW in plain words

By weight, 21% of XSW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 9% of the fund across 133 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 17.3 pts. It sits 7.5% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do IGV and XSW hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 33% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGV or XSW?
IGV has 81% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XSW has 21%, so XSW differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IGV or XSW?
IGV charges 0.38% a year and XSW charges 0.35%, so XSW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, IGV against XSW, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igv-vs-xsw

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.