Data as of .
DRAM vs URA: which is really different?
DRAM holds 20.0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and URA 0.0%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: URA scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in DRAM | Only in URA |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 27.17% | CAMECO CORP 22.39% |
| SK hynix Inc 20.19% | SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM TR 6.46% |
| Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 18.26% | NEXGEN ENERGY LTD 5.88% |
| Sandisk Corp 6.62% | OKLO INC 5.12% |
| Kioxia Holdings Corp 5.54% | URANIUM ENERGY CORP 4.72% |
| Western Digital Corp 5.46% | NAC KAZATOMPROM JSC-GDR REGS 4.42% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PL 5.32% | PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.15% |
| GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.90% | ENERGY FUELS INC 3.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DRAM | URA | DRAM | URA | DRAM | URA | |
| 3 months | −9.1% | −4.4% | −12.4 pts | −7.7 pts | −8.3 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −11.7% | not published | −27.7 pts | not published | −32.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +7.0% | not published | −10.5 pts | not published | −15.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +100.1% | not published | +22.2 pts | not published | +5.0 pts |
| Since launch | +112.9% | −34.6% | +96.1 pts | −758.0 pts | +90.6 pts | −1460.8 pts |
| DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF Holds 13 stocks in memory and storage, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | URA Global X Uranium ETF Holds 58 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | Global X |
| Theme | Memory and storage | Nuclear and uranium |
| In the S&P 500 | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 96.8% | 100.0% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 20.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 13 | 58 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 97.3% | 60.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.67% | 0.69% |
| Total return, 1 year | +112.9% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) | +7.0% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +96.1 pts | −10.5 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +90.6 pts | −15.9 pts |
| Below its high | −26.8% | −50.4% |
DRAM in plain words
By weight, 20% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 97% of the fund across 13 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +112.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 96.1 pts. It sits 26.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
URA in plain words
By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 58 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. It sits 50.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or URA?
- DRAM has 20% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, DRAM or URA?
- DRAM charges 0.65% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DRAM against URA, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-ura Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.