Do DRAM and URA hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or URA?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or URA?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and URA hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and URA

Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $5.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Uranium ETF.

DRAM on its own →URA on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

0.0%

URA in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

−30.3%

URA total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

URA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DRAM costs 0.04 points a year less; DRAM is 4.3 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DRAM vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	URA
Return
Measure	DRAM	URA
Total return, 1 year	not published	−30.3%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	URA
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026	58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
Measure	DRAM	URA
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Nuclear and uranium
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		behind by 43.7 pts
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	URA
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$23.0bn	$5.4bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	URA
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and URA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM URA

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in URA

CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%

Oklo Inc 6.09%

NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%

URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%

Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%

PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	DRAM	URA	DRAM	URA
3 months	+20.7%	−2.6%	not measured	−7.0 pts vs ACWI
6 months	+41.6%	−30.9%	not measured	−38.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	–	−30.3%	–	−43.7 pts vs ACWI
3 years	–	+65.5%	–	−23.4 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · URA Nov 2010	+95.0%	−45.1%	not measured	−417.4 pts vs ACWI

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies URA Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 57 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill Global X

Theme Memory and storage Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 15.7% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 0.0%

Holdings 12 57

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 63.0%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) −30.3%

vs its benchmark not measured −43.7 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −33.0% −58.4%

Net assets, DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 and URA as of Oct 12, 2026 $20.6bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and URA hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or URA?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or URA?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs NLR DRAM vs FDN DRAM vs SIL DRAM vs KWEB URA vs URAN URA vs SMRF URA vs UX URA vs TNUK

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →URA on its own →DRAM holdings →URA dividend history →URA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

URA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

URA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for URA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against URA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-ura

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.