Do DRAM and KMEM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or KMEM?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KMEM has 0%, so KMEM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or KMEM?

DRAM and KMEM both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs KMEM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and KMEM hold 23% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and KMEM

Net assets: $17.6bn on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $23m on Nov 3, 2026 for Kurv Memory Select ETF.

DRAM on its own →KMEM on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

0.0%

KMEM in the S&P 500

+62.5%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

−35.6%

KMEM total return, since launch, Jul 1, 2026

DRAM · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

KMEM · 3 months to Nov 4, 2026 2 positions, 28% of its net assets

KMEM holds 2 positions, 28% of its net assets. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.65% a year; DRAM is far larger, $18.4bn against $23m.

DRAM vs KMEM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	KMEM
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	KMEM
Below its all-time high	44.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026	35.6%, high on Jul 1, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	DRAM	KMEM
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Memory and storage
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	KMEM
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$18.4bn	$23m
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	KMEM
Holdings in common	23%

Method

What they share

23%

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and KMEM hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

23% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM KMEM

SK hynix Inc 15.89% 21.41%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37% 6.85%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Nanya Technology Corp 1.81%

Winbond Electronics Corp 1.11%

Only in KMEM

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs KMEM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	DRAM	KMEM
3 months	−16.1%	−16.1%
6 months	−7.3%	–
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · KMEM Jul 2026	+62.5%	−35.6%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KMEM Kurv Memory Select ETF · Holds 2 stocks in memory and storage, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill Kurv

Theme Memory and storage Memory and storage

In the S&P 500 15.7% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 0.0%

Holdings 12 2

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 28.3%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.65%

Total return, 1 year +62.5% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) −35.6% (since launch, Jul 1, 2026)

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −44.1% −35.6%

Net assets, DRAM as of Nov 4, 2026 and KMEM as of Nov 3, 2026 $17.6bn $23m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

23% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +62.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 44.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

KMEM

By weight, 0% of KMEM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 28% of the fund across 2 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Since it first traded on Jul 1, 2026 the fund returned −35.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 35.6% below its all-time high of Jul 1, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and KMEM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or KMEM?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KMEM has 0%, so KMEM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or KMEM?: DRAM and KMEM both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs HBMX DRAM vs DISK DRAM vs ARKG DRAM vs NLR KMEM vs DISK KMEM vs HBMX DRAM vs BOTZ DRAM vs ARTY

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →KMEM on its own →DRAM holdings →KMEM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

KMEM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

KMEM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Kurv page for KMEM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against KMEM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-kmem

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.