Do BOTZ and DRAM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or DRAM?

BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 16%, so DRAM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BOTZ or DRAM?

BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

BOTZ vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

BOTZ and DRAM hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOTZ and DRAM

Net assets: $3.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF, and $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF.

BOTZ on its own →DRAM on its own →

At a glance

18.6%

BOTZ in the S&P 500

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

−10.2%

BOTZ total return, 1 year

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

BOTZ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 81% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

19% of BOTZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 81% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DRAM costs 0.03 points a year less; DRAM is 7.0 times larger.

BOTZ vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM
Return
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM
Total return, 1 year	−10.2%	not published
Drawdown
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM
Below its all-time high	18.2%, high on May 13, 2026	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM
What it tracks	Robotics and automation	Memory and storage
Cost and size
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM
Expense ratio	0.68%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$3.3bn	$23.0bn
Holdings
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 10, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 28 weekly returns

BOTZ DRAM

Return

Total return edge DRAM −6.8% +45.1%

Price return edge DRAM −6.8% +45.1%

Risk

Max drawdown edge BOTZ −20.3% −39.4%

Reading

DRAM returned more: +45.1% to −6.8%. BOTZ fell less at its worst: −20.3% to −39.4%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: BOTZ vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	BOTZ	DRAM	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	−6.8%	+45.1%	DRAM	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return	−6.8%	+45.1%	DRAM	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown	−20.3%	−39.4%	BOTZ	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 28 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, BOTZ and DRAM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOTZ DRAM

Only in one fund ↓

Only in BOTZ

KEYENCE CORPORATION 9.30%

ABB Ltd 9.03%

FANUC CORPORATION 8.98%

NVIDIA CORPORATION 8.28%

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 6.14%

Shenzhen Inovance Technology Co., Ltd 4.32%

SMC CORPORATION 4.01%

DAIFUKU CO., LTD. 3.52%

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: BOTZ vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	BOTZ	DRAM
3 months	+1.0%	+20.7%
6 months	−8.8%	+41.6%
1 year	−10.2%	–
3 years	+53.7%	–
Since launchNot the same days: BOTZ Sep 2016 · DRAM Apr 2026	+140.2%	+95.0%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF · Holds 61 stocks in robotics and automation, 19% of its weight in S&P 500 companies DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Roundhill

Theme Robotics and automation Memory and storage

In the S&P 500 18.6% 15.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 88.2% 96.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 18.6% 15.7%

Holdings 61 12

Top ten, share of the fund 58.7% 56.4%

Expense ratio 0.68% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.77% 0.67%

Total return, 1 year −10.2% +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026)

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −18.2% −33.0%

Net assets, BOTZ as of Oct 12, 2026 and DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 $3.3bn $20.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for DRAM.

Alert

About each fund

BOTZ

By weight, 19% of BOTZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 88%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −10.2% with distributions reinvested. It sits 18.2% below its all-time high of May 13, 2026.

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BOTZ and DRAM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BOTZ or DRAM?: BOTZ has 19% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 16%, so DRAM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BOTZ or DRAM?: BOTZ charges 0.68% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BOTZ vs CIBR BOTZ vs SOXX BOTZ vs COPX BOTZ vs SMH DRAM vs AIRR DRAM vs GDX DRAM vs DISK DRAM vs HBMX

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →BOTZ on its own →DRAM on its own →BOTZ dividend history →BOTZ holdings →DRAM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

BOTZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

BOTZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for BOTZ ↗

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOTZ against DRAM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/botz-vs-dram

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.