DISK vs DRAM: which is really different?

DISK and DRAM hold 48% of their weight in the same names. Tema Memory ETF and Roundhill Memory ETF.

32.8%
DISK in the S&P 500
20.0%
DRAM in the S&P 500
−22.7%
DISK total return, since launch
+117.4%
DRAM total return, since launch
DISK · 3 months to Sep 30, 202667% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
67% of its weight is outside the S&P 50033% of DISK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index33%67%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 84% of the fund · 17 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 33% in67% of its weight is outside the S&P 50033% of DISK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index33%67%inoutside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 84% of the fund

33% of DISK's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 67% is outside the index

DRAM · 3 months to Sep 30, 202680% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
80% of its weight is outside the S&P 50020% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 80% is outside the index20%80%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 97% of the fund · 13 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 20% in80% of its weight is outside the S&P 50020% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 80% is outside the index20%80%inoutside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 97% of the fund

20% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 80% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · DISK scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DISK and DRAM hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

48% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DISK DRAM
SK HYNIX INC 15.84% 20.19%
SANDISK CORP 19.02% 6.62%
KIOXIA HOLDINGS CORP 16.50% 5.54%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 4.67% 5.32%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 4.48% 18.26%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 4.17% 5.46%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.88% 2.58%
NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP 3.99% 2.31%
WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORP 3.37% 1.41%
MACRONIX INTERNATIONAL CO LTD 2.60% 0.45%
Only in DISK
CHANGXIN MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES-SWAP-MREX-L 5.14%
AEHR TEST SYSTEMS 4.74%
SK SQUARE CO LTD 4.73%
INNODISK CORP 2.27%
SHENZHEN TECHWINSEMI TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 1.46%
BIWIN STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CO LTD 1.41%
SK HYNIX INC 0.70%
Only in DRAM
TREASURY BILL 27.17%
GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.90%
Phison Electronics Corp 0.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

48% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowDISKDRAMDISKDRAMDISKDRAM
3 months−13.9%−8.3%−16.4 pts−10.9 pts−16.0 pts−10.5 pts
Since launch
DISK Jun 2026 · DRAM Apr 2026
−22.7%+117.4%−25.1 pts+100.6 pts−23.3 pts+90.7 pts

DISK and DRAM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DISK
Tema Memory ETF · Holds 17 stocks in memory and storage, 33% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 13 stocks in memory and storage, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Tema Roundhill
Theme Memory and storage Memory and storage
In the S&P 500 32.8% 20.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 96.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 32.8% 20.0%
Holdings 17 13
Top ten, share of the fund 84.2% 97.3%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.65%
Fee for the differing part 0.77% 0.67%
Total return, 1 year −22.7% (since launch on Jun 30, 2026) +117.4% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −25.1 pts +100.6 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −23.3 pts +90.7 pts
Below its high −22.7% −25.2%
Net assets $88m $26.0bn

DISK and DRAM on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DISK in plain words

By weight, 33% of DISK's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 84% of the fund across 17 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Jun 30, 2026 the fund returned −22.7% with distributions reinvested against +2.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 25.1 pts. It sits 22.7% below its all-time high of Jun 30, 2026.

DRAM in plain words

By weight, 20% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 97% of the fund across 13 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +117.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.9% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 100.6 pts. It sits 25.2% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DISK and DRAM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 48% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DISK or DRAM?
DISK has 33% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 20%, so DISK differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DISK or DRAM?
DISK charges 0.75% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so DRAM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, DISK against DRAM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/disk-vs-dram

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.