Do COPX and DRAM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or DRAM?

COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 16%, so COPX differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, COPX or DRAM?

COPX and DRAM both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

COPX vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

COPX and DRAM hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COPX and DRAM

Net assets: $7.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Copper Miners ETF, and $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF.

COPX on its own →DRAM on its own →

At a glance

4.8%

COPX in the S&P 500

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

+27.5%

COPX total return, 1 year

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

COPX · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of COPX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.65% a year; DRAM is 3.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

COPX vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	COPX	DRAM
Return
Measure	COPX	DRAM
Total return, 1 year	+27.5%	not published
Drawdown
Measure	COPX	DRAM
Below its all-time high	20.3%, high on Aug 27, 2026	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	COPX	DRAM
What it tracks	Copper	Memory and storage
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 14.1 pts
Cost and size
Measure	COPX	DRAM
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$7.3bn	$23.0bn
Holdings
Measure	COPX	DRAM
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 10, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 28 weekly returns

COPX DRAM

Return

Total return edge DRAM −12.2% +45.1%

Price return edge DRAM −12.5% +45.1%

Risk

Max drawdown edge COPX −22.7% −39.4%

Reading

DRAM returned more: +45.1% to −12.2%. COPX fell less at its worst: −22.7% to −39.4%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: COPX vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	COPX	DRAM	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	−12.2%	+45.1%	DRAM	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return	−12.5%	+45.1%	DRAM	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown	−22.7%	−39.4%	COPX	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 28 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, COPX and DRAM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COPX DRAM

Only in one fund ↓

Only in COPX

BHP GROUP LIMITED 5.48%

Teck Resources Limited 5.39%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. 5.26%

SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION 5.08%

FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD. 5.04%

GLENCORE PLC 5.02%

ANTOFAGASTA PLC 5.00%

KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 4.76%

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: COPX vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	COPX	DRAM	COPX	DRAM
3 months	+0.9%	+20.7%	−3.5 pts vs ACWI	not measured
6 months	−0.8%	+41.6%	−8.2 pts vs ACWI	not measured
1 year	+27.5%	–	+14.1 pts vs ACWI	–
3 years	+141.8%	–	+52.9 pts vs ACWI	–
Since launchNot the same days: COPX Apr 2010 · DRAM Apr 2026	+146.6%	+95.0%	−248.6 pts vs ACWI	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF · Holds 40 stocks in copper, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Roundhill

Theme Copper Memory and storage

In the S&P 500 4.8% 15.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 96.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 15.7%

Holdings 40 12

Top ten, share of the fund 50.3% 56.4%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.67%

Total return, 1 year +27.5% +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026)

vs its benchmark +14.1 pts vs ACWI not measured

Below its high −20.3% −33.0%

Net assets, COPX as of Oct 12, 2026 and DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 $7.3bn $20.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for DRAM.

Alert

About each fund

COPX

By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPX and DRAM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or DRAM?: COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 16%, so COPX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPX or DRAM?: COPX and DRAM both charge 0.65% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COPX vs GDX COPX vs FDN COPX vs IFRA COPX vs XME DRAM vs IDEF DRAM vs BOTZ DRAM vs ARKG DRAM vs DISK

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →COPX on its own →DRAM on its own →COPX dividend history →COPX holdings →DRAM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

COPX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

COPX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for COPX ↗

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COPX against DRAM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copx-vs-dram

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.