Do COPX and FDN hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or FDN?

COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FDN has 82%, so COPX differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, COPX or FDN?

COPX charges 0.65% a year and FDN charges 0.49%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

COPX vs FDN: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COPX returned +27.5% to FDN's −1.1%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COPX and FDN

Net assets: $7.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Copper Miners ETF, and $5.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund.

COPX on its own →FDN on its own →

At a glance

4.8%

COPX in the S&P 500

81.9%

FDN in the S&P 500

+27.5%

COPX total return, 1 year

−1.1%

FDN total return, 1 year

COPX · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of COPX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

FDN · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 18% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

82% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FDN costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.6 points; COPX is 1.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

COPX vs FDN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	COPX	FDN
Return
Measure	COPX	FDN
Total return, 1 year	+27.5%	−1.1%
Drawdown
Measure	COPX	FDN
Below its all-time high	20.3%, high on Aug 27, 2026	6.3%, high on Oct 9, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	COPX	FDN
What it tracks	Copper	Internet and e-commerce
Against the S&P 500, 1 year		behind by 14.8 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+13.4%	+13.7%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 14.1 pts	behind by 14.8 pts
Cost and size
Measure	COPX	FDN
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.49%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$7.3bn	$5.4bn
Holdings
Measure	COPX	FDN
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 860 weekly returns

COPX FDN

Return

Total return edge FDN +152.9% +931.3%

Annualized edge FDN +5.8% +15.2%

Price return edge FDN +78.9% +929.5%

Risk

Volatility edge FDN 37.4% 23.0%

Max drawdown edge FDN −83.0% −53.4%

Downside capture 136.2% 113.1%

Beta 1.64 1.15

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge FDN 0.30 0.66

Sortino edge FDN 0.44 0.98

Treynor 0.068 0.121

Calmar edge FDN 0.07 0.28

Against the benchmark

Alpha −4.5% a year +1.8% a year

Alpha t-stat −0.69 0.64

Information ratio 0.05 0.26

Tracking error 28.4% 13.2%

Each against its own benchmark: COPX against ACWI, Apr 30, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; FDN against IVV, Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FDN returned more: +931.3% to +152.9%. FDN swung less: 23.0% to 37.4%. FDN fell less at its worst: −53.4% to −83.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: COPX vs FDN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	COPX	FDN	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+152.9%	+931.3%	FDN	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+5.8%	+15.2%	FDN	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+78.9%	+929.5%	FDN	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	37.4%	23.0%	FDN	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	25.3%	15.5%	FDN	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−83.0%	−53.4%	FDN	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	204.4%	138.3%		Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	136.2%	113.1%		Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.64	1.15	Not an edge	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.50	0.71	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.30	0.66	FDN	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.44	0.98	FDN	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.068	0.121		Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	0.07	0.28	FDN	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	ACWI	IVV		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−4.5% a year	+1.8% a year	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−0.69	0.64	Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−17.4% to +8.3%	−3.8% to +7.4%	Includes zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	0.05	0.26		Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	28.4%	13.2%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 860 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, COPX and FDN hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COPX FDN

Only in one fund ↓

Only in COPX

BHP GROUP LIMITED 5.48%

Teck Resources Limited 5.39%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. 5.26%

SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION 5.08%

FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD. 5.04%

GLENCORE PLC 5.02%

ANTOFAGASTA PLC 5.00%

KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 4.76%

Only in FDN

Amazon.com, Inc. 10.23%

Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.68%

Cisco Systems, Inc. 9.04%

Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.48%

Netflix, Inc. 5.28%

Salesforce, Inc. 4.53%

Arista Networks, Inc. 4.45%

Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.39%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: COPX vs FDN: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	COPX	FDN	COPX	FDN
3 months	+0.9%	+5.5%	−3.5 pts vs ACWI	−0.6 pts vs IVV
6 months	−0.8%	+7.7%	−8.2 pts vs ACWI	−1.4 pts vs IVV
1 year	+27.5%	−1.1%	+14.1 pts vs ACWI	−14.8 pts vs IVV
3 years	+141.8%	+89.6%	+52.9 pts vs ACWI	−5.8 pts vs IVV
Since launchNot the same days: COPX Apr 2010 · FDN Jun 2006	+146.6%	+1,282.2%	−248.6 pts vs ACWI	not measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF · Holds 40 stocks in copper, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund · Holds 41 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X First Trust

Theme Copper Internet and e-commerce

In the S&P 500 4.8% 81.9%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 85.5%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 60.0%

Holdings 40 41

Top ten, share of the fund 50.3% 61.1%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.49%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.57%

Total return, 1 year +27.5% −1.1%

vs its benchmark +14.1 pts vs ACWI −14.8 pts vs IVV

Below its high −20.3% −6.3%

Net assets, COPX as of Oct 12, 2026 and FDN as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.3bn $5.1bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CB5E72D796

COPX and FDN are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Theme. COPX covers Copper and FDN covers Internet and e-commerce.
Concentration. The top ten holdings are 50.3% of COPX and 61.1% of FDN, a gap of 10.8 points.
What each follows. COPX follows Copper and FDN follows Internet and e-commerce.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

COPX

By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.

FDN

By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 14.8 pts. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPX and FDN hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or FDN?: COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FDN has 82%, so COPX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPX or FDN?: COPX charges 0.65% a year and FDN charges 0.49%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COPX vs KWEB COPX vs XAR COPX vs QTUM COPX vs URA FDN vs IFRA FDN vs XME FDN vs IDEF FDN vs BOTZ

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →COPX on its own →FDN on its own →COPX dividend history →COPX holdings →FDN holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

COPX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

COPX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for COPX ↗

FDN filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FDN prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for FDN ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COPX against FDN, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copx-vs-fdn

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.