Do COPX and URA hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or URA?

COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, COPX or URA?

COPX charges 0.65% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so COPX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

COPX vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COPX returned +27.5% to URA's −30.3%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COPX and URA

Net assets on Oct 12, 2026: $7.3bn for Global X Copper Miners ETF and $5.4bn for Global X Uranium ETF.

COPX on its own →URA on its own →

At a glance

4.8%

COPX in the S&P 500

0.0%

URA in the S&P 500

+27.5%

COPX total return, 1 year

−30.3%

URA total return, 1 year

COPX · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 95% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

5% of COPX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 95% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

URA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of URA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

COPX costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 57.8 points; COPX is 1.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

COPX vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	COPX	URA
Return
Measure	COPX	URA
Total return, 1 year	+27.5%	−30.3%
Drawdown
Measure	COPX	URA
Below its all-time high	20.3%, high on Aug 27, 2026	58.4%, high on Feb 2, 2011
Against its benchmark
Measure	COPX	URA
What it tracks	Copper	Nuclear and uranium
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+13.4%	+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 14.1 pts	behind by 43.7 pts
Cost and size
Measure	COPX	URA
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$7.3bn	$5.4bn
Holdings
Measure	COPX	URA
Holdings in common	2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 12, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 832 weekly returns · each against ACWI

COPX URA

Return

Total return edge COPX +94.3% −51.4%

Annualized edge COPX +4.2% −4.4%

Price return edge COPX +37.4% −68.7%

Risk

Volatility edge Tie 37.1% 36.8%

Max drawdown edge COPX −83.0% −93.2%

Downside capture 136.6% 127.6%

Beta 1.62 1.31

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge COPX 0.25 0.02

Sortino edge COPX 0.37 0.02

Treynor 0.058 0.005

Calmar edge COPX 0.05 −0.05

Against the benchmark

Alpha −5.8% a year −11.7% a year

Alpha t-stat −0.87 −1.54

Information ratio 0.00 −0.29

Tracking error 28.5% 30.7%

Reading

COPX returned more: +94.3% to −51.4%. COPX and URA swung about the same: 37.1% and 36.8%. COPX fell less at its worst: −83.0% to −93.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: COPX vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	COPX	URA	ACWI	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+94.3%	−51.4%		COPX	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+4.2%	−4.4%		COPX	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+37.4%	−68.7%		COPX	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	37.1%	36.8%		Tie	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	25.1%	25.0%		Tie	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−83.0%	−93.2%		COPX	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture	194.8%	120.6%	100.0%	COPX	Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture	136.6%	127.6%	100.0%	URA (slight)	Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta	1.62	1.31	1.00	URA lower	How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared	0.48	0.32	1.00	Not an edge	Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.25	0.02		COPX	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.37	0.02		COPX	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor	0.058	0.005	0.094	COPX	Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar	0.05	−0.05		COPX	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
Benchmark	ACWI	ACWI	ACWI		The ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha	−5.8% a year	−11.7% a year	0.0%	Not significant	Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat	−0.87	−1.54		Not an edge	How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range	−19.0% to +7.3%	−26.6% to +3.2%		Both include zero	The 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio	0.00	−0.29		COPX	Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error	28.5%	30.7%	0.0%	Not an edge	How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 832 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, COPX and URA hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COPX URA

BHP GROUP LIMITED 5.48% 2.06%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in COPX

Teck Resources Limited 5.39%

Hudbay Minerals Inc. 5.26%

SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION 5.08%

FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD. 5.04%

GLENCORE PLC 5.02%

ANTOFAGASTA PLC 5.00%

KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SPOLKA AKCYJNA 4.76%

FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC. 4.76%

Only in URA

CAMECO CORPORATION 22.18%

Sprott Physical Uranium Trust 6.74%

Oklo Inc 6.09%

NEXGEN ENERGY LTD. 6.07%

URANIUM ENERGY CORP. 4.81%

Joint stock company National atomic company Kazatomprom 4.40%

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP. 3.46%

PALADIN ENERGY LTD 3.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: COPX vs URA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	COPX	URA	COPX	URA
3 months	+0.9%	−2.6%	−3.5 pts vs ACWI	−7.0 pts vs ACWI
6 months	−0.8%	−30.9%	−8.2 pts vs ACWI	−38.3 pts vs ACWI
1 year	+27.5%	−30.3%	+14.1 pts vs ACWI	−43.7 pts vs ACWI
3 years	+141.8%	+65.5%	+52.9 pts vs ACWI	−23.4 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: COPX Apr 2010 · URA Nov 2010	+146.6%	−45.1%	−248.6 pts vs ACWI	−417.4 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF · Holds 40 stocks in copper, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies URA Global X Uranium ETF · Holds 57 stocks in nuclear and uranium, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Global X Global X

Theme Copper Nuclear and uranium

In the S&P 500 4.8% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 40 57

Top ten, share of the fund 50.3% 63.0%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.65% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +27.5% −30.3%

vs its benchmark +14.1 pts vs ACWI −43.7 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −20.3% −58.4%

Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 $7.3bn $5.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-18A4765EE9

COPX and URA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Theme. COPX covers Copper and URA covers Nuclear and uranium.
Concentration. The top ten holdings are 50.3% of COPX and 63.0% of URA, a gap of 12.7 points.
What each follows. COPX follows Copper and URA follows Nuclear and uranium.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

COPX

By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 50% of the fund across 40 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.1 pts. It sits 20.3% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.

URA

By weight, 0% of URA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 63% of the fund across 57 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −30.3% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 43.7 pts. It sits 58.4% below its all-time high of Feb 2, 2011.

Questions people ask

Do COPX and URA hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or URA?: COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and URA has 0%, so URA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPX or URA?: COPX charges 0.65% a year and URA charges 0.69%, so COPX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COPX vs NLR COPX vs SIL COPX vs KWEB COPX vs XT URA vs XME URA vs IDEF URA vs BOTZ URA vs ARKG

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →COPX on its own →URA on its own →COPX dividend history →COPX holdings →URA dividend history →URA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

COPX and URA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

COPX and URA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for COPX ↗

Global X page for URA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COPX against URA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copx-vs-ura

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.