Data as of .
COPX vs XT: which is really different?
XT holds 64.0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and COPX 4.8%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: COPX scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COPX and XT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COPX | Only in XT |
|---|---|
| HUDBAY MINERALS INC 5.46% | MICROSOFT 4.21% |
| TECK RESOURCES LTD-CLS B 5.29% | NVIDIA 4.18% |
| FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS LTD 5.12% | ELI LILLY 3.90% |
| BHP GROUP LTD 5.02% | TESLA INC 3.55% |
| GLENCORE PLC 4.99% | TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 3.55% |
| KGHM POLSKA MIEDZ SA 4.86% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.48% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 4.84% | ANALOG DEVICES 2.88% |
| FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC 4.79% | AMAZON.COM INC 2.87% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COPX | XT | COPX | XT | COPX | XT | |
| 3 months | +3.3% | +0.7% | 0.0 pts | −2.6 pts | +4.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | +16.3% | +18.0% | +0.3 pts | +2.0 pts | −4.4 pts | −2.7 pts |
| 1 year | +71.5% | +25.7% | +54.0 pts | +8.2 pts | +48.5 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 3 years | +152.5% | +63.3% | +74.7 pts | −14.6 pts | +57.5 pts | −31.8 pts |
| Since launch | +184.2% | +279.7% | −560.2 pts | −61.9 pts | −1369.2 pts | −340.9 pts |
| COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF Holds 41 stocks in electrification and the grid, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF Holds 192 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 64% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | iShares |
| Theme | Electrification and the grid | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 4.8% | 64.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.9% | 67.4% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 38.8% |
| Holdings | 41 | 192 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 49.4% | 33.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.65% | 0.68% |
| Total return, 1 year | +71.5% | +25.7% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +54.0 pts | +8.2 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +48.5 pts | +2.8 pts |
| Below its high | −8.2% | −3.2% |
COPX in plain words
By weight, 5% of COPX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +71.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 54.0 pts. It sits 8.2% below its all-time high of Aug 27, 2026.
XT in plain words
By weight, 64% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 67%. The top ten holdings are 34% of the fund across 192 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +25.7% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 8.2 pts.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPX or XT?
- COPX has 5% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 64%, so COPX differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, COPX or XT?
- COPX charges 0.65% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COPX against XT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copx-vs-xt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.