Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

PPA vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, PPA returned −0.2% to XT's +22.1%; 2% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about PPA and XT

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $7.4bn for Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF and $4.1bn for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF.

At a glance
76.7%
PPA in the S&P 500
65.5%
XT in the S&P 500
−0.2%
PPA total return, 1 year
+22.1%
XT total return, 1 year
PPA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 23% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
23% of its weight is outside the S&P 50077% of PPA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 23% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.77%23%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 96% · top ten 61% of the fund · 70 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 4% in23% of its weight is outside the S&P 50077% of PPA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 23% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.77%23%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 96% · Nasdaq-100: 4% in

77% of PPA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 23% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

XT · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 35% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
35% of its weight is outside the S&P 50066% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.66%35%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 69% · top ten 37% of the fund · 197 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 42% in35% of its weight is outside the S&P 50066% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.66%35%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 69% · Nasdaq-100: 42% in

66% of XT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 35% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

XT costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.3 points; PPA is 1.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

PPA vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasurePPAXT
Return
Total return, 1 year−0.2%+22.1%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high14.5%, high on Mar 2, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksDefenseBroad innovation and megatrends
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 13.9 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.7%+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 13.9 ptsahead by 8.7 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.58%0.46%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$7.4bn$4.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common2%
ETFIQ S&P 500 Difference Score · PPA scores higher How much of its weight does it not share with the S&P 500?
IQ Themes Score74.6PPA14.7XT

How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.4, the lowest in this set 99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 2, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 603 weekly returns
PPA XT
Return
Total return edge PPA +368.7% +292.0%
Annualized edge PPA +14.2% +12.5%
Price return edge PPA +321.7% +225.6%
Risk
Volatility edge XT 21.3% 19.0%
Max drawdown edge XT −41.9% −34.3%
Downside capture 98.7% 108.7%
Beta 1.03 1.11
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge PPA (slight) 0.63 0.60
Sortino edge PPA (slight) 0.92 0.87
Treynor 0.121 0.103
Calmar edge XT (slight) 0.34 0.36
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.8% a year +1.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.77 0.61
Information ratio 0.20 0.33
Tracking error 10.7% 6.5%

Each against its own benchmark: PPA against IVV, Nov 4, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026; XT against ACWI, Apr 2, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

PPA returned more: +368.7% to +292.0%. XT swung less: 19.0% to 21.3%. XT fell less at its worst: −34.3% to −41.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: PPA vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasurePPAXTEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+368.7%+292.0%PPAPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.2%+12.5%PPATotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+321.7%+225.6%PPAPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility21.3%19.0%XTSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.6%13.2%XT (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−41.9%−34.3%XTDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture102.4%123.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture98.7%108.7%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.031.11Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.740.89Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.630.60PPA (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.920.87PPA (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.103Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.340.36XT (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.8% a year+1.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.770.61Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.8% to +6.4%−2.5% to +4.7%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.200.33Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.7%6.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 603 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

2%

By the books each fund has filed, PPA and XT hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

2% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first PPA XT
Northrop Grumman Corp 5.30% 0.80%
Palantir Technologies Inc 1.75% 0.49%
Eaton Corp PLC 1.80% 0.40%
Space Exploration Technologies Corp 0.92% 0.30%
Amphenol Corp 2.16% 0.19%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in PPA
Lockheed Martin Corp 9.65%
RTX Corp 9.32%
General Electric Co 8.53%
Boeing Co 7.79%
General Dynamics Corp 5.51%
Honeywell Aerospace Inc 4.08%
L3Harris Technologies Inc 4.07%
TransDigm Group Inc 3.47%
Only in XT
TEXAS INSTRUMENT 4.56%
TESLA INC 4.45%
ELI LILLY 4.32%
MICROSOFT 4.11%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 3.67%
NVIDIA 3.66%
ANALOG DEVICES 3.33%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.02%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: PPA vs XT: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowPPAXTPPAXT
3 months−7.2%+10.2%−13.3 pts vs IVV+5.8 pts vs ACWI
6 months−3.0%+14.0%−12.1 pts vs IVV+6.6 pts vs ACWI
1 year−0.2%+22.1%−13.9 pts vs IVV+8.7 pts vs ACWI
3 years+102.1%+93.2%+6.7 pts vs IVV+4.3 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: PPA Oct 2005 · XT Mar 2015+1,190.0%+297.8%not measured+71.7 pts vs ACWI

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF · Holds 70 stocks in defense, 77% of its weight in S&P 500 companies XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF · Holds 197 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 66% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Defense Broad innovation and megatrends
In the S&P 500 76.7% 65.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 96.4% 69.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 3.8% 41.6%
Holdings 70 197
Top ten, share of the fund 61.2% 36.6%
Expense ratio 0.58% 0.46%
Fee for the differing part 0.60% 0.66%
Total return, 1 year −0.2% +22.1%
vs its benchmark −13.9 pts vs IVV +8.7 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −14.5% −0.5%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.4bn $4.1bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

2% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5158C9070D

PPA and XT are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. PPA covers Defense and XT covers Broad innovation and megatrends.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 61.2% of PPA and 36.6% of XT, a gap of 24.6 points.
  3. What each follows. PPA follows Defense and XT follows Broad innovation and megatrends.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

PPA and XT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
PPA

By weight, 77% of PPA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 70 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −0.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 13.9 pts. It sits 14.5% below its all-time high of Mar 2, 2026.

XT

By weight, 66% of XT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 197 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index, so a holder was ahead by 8.7 pts.

Questions people ask

Do PPA and XT hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, PPA or XT?
PPA has 77% of its weight in S&P 500 names and XT has 66%, so PPA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, PPA or XT?
PPA charges 0.58% a year and XT charges 0.46%, so XT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, PPA against XT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ppa-vs-xt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.