Do COPP and POW hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPP or POW?

COPP has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and POW has 31%, so COPP differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, COPP or POW?

COPP charges 0.66% a year and POW charges 0.75%, so COPP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

COPP vs POW: which is really different?

COPP and POW hold 0% of their weight in the same names. Sprott Copper Miners ETF and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF.

25.1%

COPP in the S&P 500

31.3%

POW in the S&P 500

+51.2%

COPP total return, 1 year

+28.5%

POW total return, since launch

COPP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202675% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

25% of COPP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index

POW · 6 months to Sep 30, 202669% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

31% of POW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · COPP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

COPP 82.3

POW 46.9

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COPP and POW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COPP POW

Only in COPP

Freeport-mcmoran Inc 25.12%

Teck Resources Ltd 10.04%

Antofagasta Plc 9.35%

Sprott Physical Copper Trust 5.22%

Kghm Polska Miedz Sa 4.89%

Southern Copper Corp 4.83%

First Quantum Minerals Ltd 4.70%

Lundin Mining Corp 4.32%

Only in POW

Delta Electronics Inc 5.82%

Quanta Services Inc 5.23%

Eaton Corp PLC 4.86%

Prysmian SpA 4.22%

nVent Electric PLC 4.20%

LS Electric Co Ltd 3.98%

Hyosung Heavy Industries Corp 3.85%

Powell Industries Inc 3.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	COPP	POW	COPP	POW	COPP	POW
3 months	+10.9%	−13.0%	+8.4 pts	−15.6 pts	+8.8 pts	−15.2 pts
6 months	+14.0%	+5.5%	−3.0 pts	−11.5 pts	−12.9 pts	−21.4 pts
1 year	+51.2%	not published	+35.5 pts	not published	+27.4 pts	not published
Since launch COPP Mar 2024 · POW Oct 2025	+117.4%	+28.5%	+62.9 pts	+16.3 pts	+46.4 pts	+11.1 pts

COPP and POW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

COPP

Sprott Copper Miners ETF · Holds 80 stocks in copper, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

POW

VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF · Holds 54 stocks in electrification and the grid, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott VistaShares

Theme Copper Electrification and the grid

In the S&P 500 25.1% 31.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 97.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 7.4%

Holdings 80 54

Top ten, share of the fund 76.1% 42.5%

Expense ratio 0.66% 0.75%

Fee for the differing part 0.66% 0.77%

Total return, 1 year +51.2% +28.5% (since launch on Oct 28, 2025)

vs the S&P 500 +35.5 pts +16.3 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +27.4 pts +11.1 pts

Below its high −11.1% −22.3%

Net assets $279m $62m

COPP and POW on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COPP in plain words

By weight, 25% of COPP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 80 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +51.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 35.5 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

POW in plain words

By weight, 31% of POW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 54 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Oct 28, 2025 the fund returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested against +12.2% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 16.3 pts. It sits 22.3% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPP and POW hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPP or POW?: COPP has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and POW has 31%, so COPP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPP or POW?: COPP charges 0.66% a year and POW charges 0.75%, so COPP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COPP vs JOUL COPP vs ZAP COPP vs COPX COPP vs ELFY POW vs POWR POW vs TRFM POW vs VOLT POW vs ZAP

COPP on its own →POW on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COPP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COPP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for COPP ↗POW filings on SEC EDGAR ↗POW prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗VistaShares page for POW ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COPP against POW, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copp-vs-pow

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.