Do COPP and ZAP hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPP or ZAP?

COPP has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ZAP has 76%, so COPP differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, COPP or ZAP?

COPP charges 0.66% a year and ZAP charges 0.50%, so ZAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

COPP vs ZAP: which is really different?

COPP and ZAP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COPP returned +51.2% over the year. Sprott Copper Miners ETF and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF.

25.1%

COPP in the S&P 500

75.5%

ZAP in the S&P 500

+51.2%

COPP total return, 1 year

+4.9%

ZAP total return, 1 year

COPP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202675% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

25% of COPP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index

ZAP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202625% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

76% of ZAP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 25% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · COPP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

COPP 82.3

ZAP 48.1

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COPP and ZAP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding COPP ZAP

Only in COPP

Freeport-mcmoran Inc 25.12%

Teck Resources Ltd 10.04%

Antofagasta Plc 9.35%

Sprott Physical Copper Trust 5.22%

Kghm Polska Miedz Sa 4.89%

Southern Copper Corp 4.83%

First Quantum Minerals Ltd 4.70%

Lundin Mining Corp 4.32%

Only in ZAP

BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A 5.89%

QUANTA SERVICES INC 4.71%

EATON CORP PLC 4.67%

AMETEK INC 4.63%

DOMINION ENERGY INC 4.27%

CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC 4.08%

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 3.92%

DUKE ENERGY CORP 3.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	COPP	ZAP	COPP	ZAP	COPP	ZAP
3 months	+10.9%	−9.8%	+8.4 pts	−12.3 pts	+8.8 pts	−11.9 pts
6 months	+14.0%	−5.3%	−3.0 pts	−22.3 pts	−12.9 pts	−32.2 pts
1 year	+51.2%	+4.9%	+35.5 pts	−10.8 pts	+27.4 pts	−18.9 pts
Since launch COPP Mar 2024 · ZAP Dec 2024	+117.4%	+30.4%	+62.9 pts	−2.6 pts	+46.4 pts	−14.2 pts

COPP and ZAP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

COPP

Sprott Copper Miners ETF · Holds 80 stocks in copper, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

ZAP

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF · Holds 47 stocks in electrification and the grid, 76% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Sprott Global X

Theme Copper Electrification and the grid

In the S&P 500 25.1% 75.5%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 97.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 15.3%

Holdings 80 47

Top ten, share of the fund 76.1% 43.8%

Expense ratio 0.66% 0.50%

Fee for the differing part 0.66% 0.51%

Total return, 1 year +51.2% +4.9%

vs the S&P 500 +35.5 pts −10.8 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 +27.4 pts −18.9 pts

Below its high −11.1% −12.6%

Net assets $279m $436m

COPP and ZAP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COPP in plain words

By weight, 25% of COPP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 80 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +51.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 35.5 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

ZAP in plain words

By weight, 76% of ZAP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 47 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.8 pts. It sits 12.6% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPP and ZAP hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPP or ZAP?: COPP has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ZAP has 76%, so COPP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPP or ZAP?: COPP charges 0.66% a year and ZAP charges 0.50%, so ZAP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

COPP vs VOLT COPP vs GRID COPP vs ICOP COPP vs JOUL ZAP vs ELFY ZAP vs GRID ZAP vs COPX ZAP vs EMET

COPP on its own →ZAP on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

COPP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗COPP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Sprott page for COPP ↗ZAP filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ZAP prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Global X page for ZAP ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, COPP against ZAP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copp-vs-zap

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.