ICOP vs POW: which is really different?

ICOP and POW hold 0% of their weight in the same names. iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF.

13.2%
ICOP in the S&P 500
31.3%
POW in the S&P 500
+44.3%
ICOP total return, 1 year
+28.5%
POW total return, since launch
ICOP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202687% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 87 holdings filed Sep 29, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund

13% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index

POW · 6 months to Sep 30, 202669% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of POW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index31%69%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 43% of the fund · 54 holdings filed Oct 1, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in69% of its weight is outside the S&P 50031% of POW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index31%69%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 43% of the fund

31% of POW's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 69% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · ICOP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ICOP and POW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 1, 2026 and Sep 29, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ICOP POW
JPY CASH 0.00% 0.00%
Only in ICOP
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 8.29%
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 8.16%
GRUPO MEXICO B 8.11%
BHP GROUP LTD 7.76%
TECK RESOURCES SUBORDINATE VOTING 5.68%
NEWMONT 4.93%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 4.89%
FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS 4.80%
Only in POW
Delta Electronics Inc 5.82%
Quanta Services Inc 5.23%
Eaton Corp PLC 4.86%
Prysmian SpA 4.22%
nVent Electric PLC 4.20%
LS Electric Co Ltd 3.98%
Hyosung Heavy Industries Corp 3.85%
Powell Industries Inc 3.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowICOPPOWICOPPOWICOPPOW
3 months+9.6%−13.0%+7.1 pts−15.6 pts+7.5 pts−15.2 pts
6 months+8.9%+5.5%−8.0 pts−11.5 pts−17.9 pts−21.4 pts
1 year+44.3%not published+28.5 ptsnot published+20.5 ptsnot published
3 years+137.4%not published+52.4 ptsnot published+27.4 ptsnot published
Since launch
ICOP Jun 2023 · POW Oct 2025
+134.9%+28.5%+51.7 pts+16.3 pts+27.1 pts+11.1 pts

ICOP and POW over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Holds 87 stocks in copper, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
POW
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF · Holds 54 stocks in electrification and the grid, 31% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer iShares VistaShares
Theme Copper Electrification and the grid
In the S&P 500 13.2% 31.3%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.7% 97.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 7.4%
Holdings 87 54
Top ten, share of the fund 61.5% 42.5%
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.75%
Fee for the differing part 0.47% 0.77%
Total return, 1 year +44.3% +28.5% (since launch on Oct 28, 2025)
vs the S&P 500 +28.5 pts +16.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +20.5 pts +11.1 pts
Below its high −12.6% −22.3%
Net assets $467m $62m

ICOP and POW on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ICOP in plain words

By weight, 13% of ICOP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 87 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +44.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.5 pts. It sits 12.6% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

POW in plain words

By weight, 31% of POW's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 54 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Since it launched on Oct 28, 2025 the fund returned +28.5% with distributions reinvested against +12.2% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 16.3 pts. It sits 22.3% below its all-time high of May 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do ICOP and POW hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ICOP or POW?
ICOP has 13% of its weight in S&P 500 names and POW has 31%, so ICOP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ICOP or POW?
ICOP charges 0.47% a year and POW charges 0.75%, so ICOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ICOP against POW, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/icop-vs-pow

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.