Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

CIBR vs GNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CIBR returned +29.8% to GNR's +32.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CIBR and GNR

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $16.9bn for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF and $5.3bn for State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF.

At a glance
60.8%
CIBR in the S&P 500
25.9%
GNR in the S&P 500
+29.8%
CIBR total return, 1 year
+32.9%
GNR total return, 1 year
CIBR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 39% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50061% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.61%39%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 55% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 43% in39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50061% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.61%39%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 91% · Nasdaq-100: 43% in

61% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

GNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 74% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.26%74%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 37% of the fund · 104 holdings as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 1% in74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.26%74%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 1% in

26% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GNR costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; CIBR is 3.2 times larger.

CIBR vs GNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureCIBRGNR
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.8%+32.9%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high11.5%, high on Oct 9, 20266.8%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksCybersecurityNatural resources
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.58%0.40%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$16.9bn$5.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55%36%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and GNR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CIBR GNR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CIBR
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.70%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.66%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 7.53%
Broadcom Inc. 7.37%
Fortinet, Inc. 6.16%
Zscaler, Inc. 4.30%
Okta, Inc. 4.24%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 3.68%
Only in GNR
SHELL PLC 5.51%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 5.23%
BHP GROUP LTD 4.44%
NUTRIEN LTD 4.43%
TOTALENERGIES SE 3.68%
CHEVRON CORP 3.00%
UPM KYMMENE OYJ 2.82%
NEWMONT CORP 2.71%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CIBR vs GNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowCIBRGNR
3 months−0.2%+1.4%
6 months+38.9%+0.4%
1 year+29.8%+32.9%
3 years+116.2%+50.3%
Since launchNot the same days: CIBR Jul 2015 · GNR Sep 2010+416.8%+138.2%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · Holds 45 stocks in cybersecurity, 61% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GNR State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF · Holds 104 stocks in natural resources, 26% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Cybersecurity Natural resources
In the S&P 500 60.8% 25.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 90.7% 97.6%
In the Nasdaq-100 43.1% 0.6%
Holdings 45 104
Top ten, share of the fund 55.4% 36.5%
Expense ratio 0.58% 0.40%
Fee for the differing part 0.64% 0.41%
Total return, 1 year +29.8% +32.9%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −11.5% −6.8%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $16.9bn $5.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

CIBR and GNR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CIBR

By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +29.8% with distributions reinvested. It sits 11.5% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2026.

GNR

By weight, 26% of GNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 104 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CIBR and GNR hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or GNR?
CIBR has 61% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GNR has 26%, so GNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CIBR or GNR?
CIBR charges 0.58% a year and GNR charges 0.40%, so GNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CIBR against GNR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-gnr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.