Do DRAM and GNR hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or GNR?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GNR has 26%, so GNR differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or GNR?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and GNR charges 0.40%, so GNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs GNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and GNR hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and GNR

Net assets: $17.6bn on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $5.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF.

DRAM on its own →GNR on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

25.9%

GNR in the S&P 500

+62.5%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

+32.9%

GNR total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Nov 4, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

GNR · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 74% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

26% of GNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GNR costs 0.25 points a year less; DRAM is 3.5 times larger.

DRAM vs GNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	GNR
Return
Measure	DRAM	GNR
Total return, 1 year	not published	+32.9%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	GNR
Below its all-time high	44.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026	6.8%, high on Sep 9, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	DRAM	GNR
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Natural resources
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	GNR
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.40%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$18.4bn	$5.3bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	GNR
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	56%	36%

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and GNR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM GNR

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in GNR

SHELL PLC 5.51%

EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 5.23%

BHP GROUP LTD 4.44%

NUTRIEN LTD 4.43%

TOTALENERGIES SE 3.68%

CHEVRON CORP 3.00%

UPM KYMMENE OYJ 2.82%

NEWMONT CORP 2.71%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs GNR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	DRAM	GNR
3 months	−16.1%	+1.4%
6 months	−7.3%	+0.4%
1 year	–	+32.9%
3 years	–	+50.3%
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · GNR Sep 2010	+62.5%	+138.2%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GNR State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF · Holds 104 stocks in natural resources, 26% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill State Street

Theme Memory and storage Natural resources

In the S&P 500 15.7% 25.9%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 97.6%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 0.6%

Holdings 12 104

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 36.5%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.40%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.41%

Total return, 1 year +62.5% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) +32.9%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −44.1% −6.8%

Net assets, DRAM as of Nov 4, 2026 and GNR as of Nov 3, 2026 $17.6bn $5.3bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +62.5% with distributions reinvested. It sits 44.1% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

GNR

By weight, 26% of GNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 36% of the fund across 104 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested. It sits 6.8% below its all-time high of Sep 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and GNR hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or GNR?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GNR has 26%, so GNR differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or GNR?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and GNR charges 0.40%, so GNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs GUNR DRAM vs XAR DRAM vs URA DRAM vs QTUM GNR vs PAVE GNR vs GDX GNR vs IGV GNR vs GRID

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →GNR on its own →DRAM holdings →GNR dividend history →GNR holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

GNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

GNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

State Street website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against GNR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-gnr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.