NVDB vs NVDG: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NVDB finished 6.4 points from its stated multiple and NVDG 7.8. ProShares Ultra NVDA and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF.

NVDG costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; NVDG is 1.2 times larger.

NVDBNVDG
Expense ratio0.95%0.76%
Net assets, NVDB as of Oct 9, 2026 and NVDG as of Oct 8, 2026$5m$6m
Total return, 1 year+9.0%+8.7%
What it tracksNVDANVDA
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months+14.4%+14.4%
Against its daily multiple, 3 months3.2 points short4.6 points short
What the underlying did, 3 monthsNVDA 8.8%NVDA 8.8%
+11.2%
NVDB returned, 3 months
+9.8%
NVDG returned, 3 months
−6.4 pts
NVDB from its stated multiple: compounding −3.2 pts, the fund −3.2 pts
−7.8 pts
NVDG from its stated multiple: compounding −3.2 pts, the fund −4.6 pts
NVDB · 3 months to Oct 9, 20266.4 pts short of its stated multiple
6.4 pts short of its stated multipleNVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDB returned+11.2%6.4 pts short of its stated multipleNVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDB returned+11.2%

NVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDG · 3 months to Oct 9, 20267.8 pts short of its stated multiple
7.8 pts short of its stated multipleNVDG returned +9.8% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDG returned+9.8%7.8 pts short of its stated multipleNVDG returned +9.8% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDG returned+9.8%

NVDG returned +9.8% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NVDB scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNVDBNVDGNVDBNVDGNVDBNVDG
1 month+3.5%+2.4%+5.3%+5.3%−1.7 pts−2.9 pts
3 months+11.2%+9.8%+17.6%+17.6%−6.4 pts−7.8 pts
6 months+29.7%+28.4%+43.7%+43.7%−13.9 pts−15.3 pts
1 year+9.0%+8.7%+38.7%+38.7%−29.7 pts−30.0 pts
Since launch
NVDB Sep 2025 · NVDG Dec 2024
+26.3%+61.5%+59.2%+142.5%−32.9 pts−81.0 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NVDB
ProShares Ultra NVDA · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset NVDA NVDA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +11.2% +9.8%
Underlying returned, over that window +8.8% +8.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +17.6% +17.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −6.4 pts −7.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +9.0% +8.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −29.7 pts −30.0 pts
Underlying volatility 37% 37%
Difference over the days both have traded −6.4 pts −7.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.76%
First traded Sep 10, 2025 Dec 13, 2024
Net assets, NVDB as of Oct 9, 2026 and NVDG as of Oct 8, 2026 $5m $6m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NVDB in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: NVDB returned +11.2% where its own daily promise gave +14.4%, 3.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 8.8% implies +17.6%, which makes NVDB look 6.4 points short. That 6.4 is two pieces: daily compounding, −3.2 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −3.2 points against its own daily promise. NVDB aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 37% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDG in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: NVDG returned +9.8% where its own daily promise gave +14.4%, 4.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 8.8% implies +17.6%, which makes NVDG look 7.8 points short. That 7.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −3.2 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −4.6 points against its own daily promise. NVDG aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDB or NVDG?
Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, NVDB finished 6.4 points from what its multiple implies and NVDG finished 7.8 points from its own, so NVDB came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDB and NVDG levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDB at +2 times and NVDG at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDB or NVDG?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDB’s moved at 37% annualized and NVDG’s at 37%, so NVDB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDB or NVDG for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDB or NVDG?
NVDB charges 0.95% a year and NVDG charges 0.76%, so NVDG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NVDB against NVDG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nvdb-vs-nvdg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.