NVDB vs NVDD: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, NVDB finished 3.2 points short and NVDD 1.5 points over. ProShares Ultra NVDA and Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X ETF.

NVDB costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 30.4 points; NVDD is 3.1 times larger.

NVDBNVDD
Expense ratio0.95%1.01%
Net assets, NVDB as of Oct 9, 2026 and NVDD as of Oct 8, 2026$5m$16m
Total return, 1 year+9.0%−21.4%
What it tracksNVDANVDA
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months+14.4%−11.3%
What the underlying did, 3 monthsNVDA 8.8%NVDA 8.8%
+11.2%
NVDB returned, 3 months
−9.8%
NVDD returned, 3 months
−6.4 pts
NVDB from its stated multiple: compounding −3.2 pts, the fund −3.2 pts
−1.0 pts
NVDD from its stated multiple: compounding −2.5 pts, the fund +1.5 pts
NVDB · 3 months to Oct 9, 20266.4 pts short of its stated multiple
6.4 pts short of its stated multipleNVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDB returned+11.2%6.4 pts short of its stated multipleNVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDB returned+11.2%

NVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDD · 3 months to Oct 9, 20261 pt short of its stated multiple
1 pt short of its stated multipleNVDD returned −9.8% while −1 times NVDA's move would have been −8.8%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×−1 implies−8.8%NVDD returned−9.8%1 pt short of its stated multipleNVDD returned −9.8% while −1 times NVDA's move would have been −8.8%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×−1 implies−8.8%NVDD returned−9.8%

NVDD returned −9.8% while −1 times NVDA's move would have been −8.8%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDD returned −9.8% while −1 times NVDA's move would have been −8.8%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NVDD scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NVDB among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

NVDB 37.4
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

NVDD among the 128 inverse ETFs over three months

NVDD 44.9
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. NVDD is a percentile among the 128 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNVDBNVDDNVDBNVDDNVDBNVDD
1 month+3.5%−2.5%+5.3%−2.6%−1.7 pts+0.2 pts
3 months+11.2%−9.8%+17.6%−8.8%−6.4 pts−1.0 pts
6 months+29.7%−21.1%+43.7%−21.8%−13.9 pts+0.7 pts
1 year+9.0%−21.4%+38.7%−19.4%−29.7 pts−2.1 pts
3 yearsnot published−86.9%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch
NVDB Sep 2025 · NVDD Sep 2023
+26.3%−87.0%+59.2%not meaningful−32.9 ptsnot meaningful

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NVDB
ProShares Ultra NVDA · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDD
Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X ETF · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
Sets out to return +2x -1x
Underlying asset NVDA NVDA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +11.2% −9.8%
Underlying returned, over that window +8.8% +8.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +17.6% −8.8%
Difference from stated, over that window −6.4 pts −1.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +9.0% −21.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −29.7 pts −2.1 pts
Underlying volatility 37% 37%
Difference over the days both have traded −6.4 pts no shared window
Expense ratio 0.95% 1.01%
First traded Sep 10, 2025 Sep 13, 2023
Net assets, NVDB as of Oct 9, 2026 and NVDD as of Oct 8, 2026 $5m $16m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NVDB in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: NVDB returned +11.2% where its own daily promise gave +14.4%, 3.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 8.8% implies +17.6%, which makes NVDB look 6.4 points short. That 6.4 is two pieces: daily compounding, −3.2 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −3.2 points against its own daily promise. NVDB aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 37% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDD in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: NVDD returned −9.8% where its own daily promise gave −11.3%, 1.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times NVDA's 8.8% implies −8.8%, which makes NVDD look 1.0 points short. That 1.0 is two pieces: daily compounding, −2.5 points, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, +1.5 points against its own daily promise. NVDD aims to return -1 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDB or NVDD?
Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, NVDB finished 6.4 points from what its multiple implies and NVDD finished 1.0 points from its own, so NVDD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDB and NVDD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDB at +2 times and NVDD at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDB or NVDD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDB’s moved at 37% annualized and NVDD’s at 37%, so NVDB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDB or NVDD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDB or NVDD?
NVDB charges 0.95% a year and NVDD charges 1.01%, so NVDB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NVDB against NVDD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nvdb-vs-nvdd

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.