NVDB vs NVDU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NVDB finished 6.4 points from its stated multiple and NVDU 5.8. ProShares Ultra NVDA and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X ETF.

NVDU costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; NVDU is far larger, $528m against $5m.

NVDBNVDU
Expense ratio0.95%0.92%
Net assets, NVDB as of Oct 9, 2026 and NVDU as of Oct 8, 2026$5m$528m
Total return, 1 year+9.0%+11.6%
What it tracksNVDANVDA
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months+14.4%+14.4%
Against its daily multiple, 3 months3.2 points short
What the underlying did, 3 monthsNVDA 8.8%NVDA 8.8%
+11.2%
NVDB returned, 3 months
+11.8%
NVDU returned, 3 months
−6.4 pts
NVDB from its stated multiple: compounding −3.2 pts, the fund −3.2 pts
−5.8 pts
NVDU from its stated multiple: compounding −3.2 pts, the fund −2.6 pts
NVDB · 3 months to Oct 9, 20266.4 pts short of its stated multiple
6.4 pts short of its stated multipleNVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDB returned+11.2%6.4 pts short of its stated multipleNVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDB returned+11.2%

NVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDB returned +11.2% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

NVDU · 3 months to Oct 9, 20265.8 pts short of its stated multiple
5.8 pts short of its stated multipleNVDU returned +11.8% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDU returned+11.8%5.8 pts short of its stated multipleNVDU returned +11.8% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.NVDA +8.8% ×2 implies+17.6%NVDU returned+11.8%

NVDU returned +11.8% while 2 times NVDA's move would have been +17.6%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NVDU scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNVDBNVDUNVDBNVDUNVDBNVDU
1 month+3.5%+4.1%+5.3%+5.3%−1.7 pts−1.2 pts
3 months+11.2%+11.8%+17.6%+17.6%−6.4 pts−5.8 pts
6 months+29.7%+31.6%+43.7%+43.7%−13.9 pts−12.1 pts
1 year+9.0%+11.6%+38.7%+38.7%−29.7 pts−27.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+621.9%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch
NVDB Sep 2025 · NVDU Sep 2023
+26.3%+624.1%+59.2%not meaningful−32.9 ptsnot meaningful

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NVDB
ProShares Ultra NVDA · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset NVDA NVDA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +11.2% +11.8%
Underlying returned, over that window +8.8% +8.8%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +17.6% +17.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −6.4 pts −5.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +9.0% +11.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −29.7 pts −27.1 pts
Underlying volatility 37% 37%
Difference over the days both have traded −6.4 pts −5.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.92%
First traded Sep 10, 2025 Sep 13, 2023
Net assets, NVDB as of Oct 9, 2026 and NVDU as of Oct 8, 2026 $5m $528m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NVDB in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: NVDB returned +11.2% where its own daily promise gave +14.4%, 3.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 8.8% implies +17.6%, which makes NVDB look 6.4 points short. That 6.4 is two pieces: daily compounding, −3.2 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −3.2 points against its own daily promise. NVDB aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 37% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDU in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: NVDU returned +11.8% where its own daily promise gave +14.4%, 2.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times NVDA's 8.8% implies +17.6%, which makes NVDU look 5.8 points short. That 5.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −3.2 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.6 points against its own daily promise. NVDU aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDB or NVDU?
Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, NVDB finished 6.4 points from what its multiple implies and NVDU finished 5.8 points from its own, so NVDU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDB and NVDU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDB at +2 times and NVDU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDB or NVDU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDB’s moved at 37% annualized and NVDU’s at 37%, so NVDB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDB or NVDU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDB or NVDU?
NVDB charges 0.95% a year and NVDU charges 0.92%, so NVDU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, NVDB against NVDU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nvdb-vs-nvdu

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.