Data as of .
OMAH vs TSPY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against TSPY’s 14.1%, though TSPY returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and TSPY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OMAH | Only in TSPY |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 10.59% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | |
| American Express Co 6.57% | |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | TSPY | OMAH | TSPY | OMAH | TSPY | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +2.3% | 3.7% | 3.5% | −2.4 pts | 0.0 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +16.4% | 7.7% | 7.6% | +2.8 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +15.1% | 14.4% | 14.1% | +4.9 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +37.3% | 21.4% | 28.7% | +12.4 pts | −4.0 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | TappAlpha |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 14.0% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.77% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 14.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +15.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −1.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 764 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $311m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
TSPY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TSPY paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or TSPY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and TSPY paid 14.1%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or TSPY?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and TSPY returned +15.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so TSPY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or TSPY?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and TSPY charges 0.77%, so TSPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against TSPY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-tspy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.