Data as of .
OMAH vs TPAY: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and TPAY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and TPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OMAH | Only in TPAY |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 10.59% | SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 61.75% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | SPY 04/16/2027 33.18 C 33.20% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | SPYM 03/12/2027 3.33 C 5.05% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | TPAY | OMAH | TPAY | OMAH | TPAY | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +1.5% | 3.7% | 2.4% | −2.4 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +17.3% | 7.7% | 5.3% | +2.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +11.0% | 21.4% | 5.8% | +12.4 pts | −0.8 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | TPAY Roundhill S&P 500 Target 10 Managed Distribution ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 9.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.49% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 5.8% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +4.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +11.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +11.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −0.8 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 212 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $2m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
TPAY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPAY paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +11.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or TPAY?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and TPAY charges 0.49%, so TPAY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against TPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-tpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.