Data as of .
OMAH vs OVLH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against OVLH’s 0.3% and the two finished level on total return.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and OVLH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in OMAH | Only in OVLH |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 10.59% | Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | |
| American Express Co 6.57% | |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | OVLH | OMAH | OVLH | OMAH | OVLH | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +0.5% | 3.7% | 0.0% | −2.4 pts | −1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +11.0% | 7.7% | 0.0% | +2.8 pts | −7.0 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +9.1% | 14.4% | 0.3% | +4.9 pts | −7.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +54.7% | not published | 1.7% | not published | −23.7 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +73.7% | 21.4% | 3.1% | +12.4 pts | −45.2 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF Put-selling overlay, hedged on SPY, paying annual | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | Overlay Shares |
| Strategy | covered call | put-selling overlay, hedged |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | annual |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 0.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 0.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | +8.8% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +9.1% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −7.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 2072 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $116m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
OVLH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVLH paid 0.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 0.3%, paid annual.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or OVLH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and OVLH paid 0.3%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or OVLH?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and OVLH returned +9.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OVLH returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against OVLH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-ovlh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.