Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OMAH vs XPAY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XPAY paid 19.9% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF.

14.4%OMAH cash paid, 1 year
19.9%XPAY cash paid, 1 year
+8.8%OMAH total return, 1 year
+15.7%XPAY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

OMAH 65.2XPAY 50.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

OMAH4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
BRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%14.4% of it arrived as cash4.9 pts ahead of BRK-BTotal return, distributions reinvestedBRK-B+3.9%OMAH+8.8%4.9 pts ahead of BRK-B
XPAY0.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XPAY+15.7%19.9% of it arrived as cash0.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XPAY+15.7%19.9% as cash0.9 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and XPAY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in OMAHOnly in XPAY
Apple Inc 10.59%SPY 02/12/2027 33.47 C 13.75%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22%SPY 07/16/2027 36.7 C 11.79%
American Express Co 6.57%SPY 03/12/2027 33.67 C 11.51%
Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94%SPY 04/16/2027 33.87 C 11.49%
VeriSign Inc 4.90%SPY 06/11/2027 37.11 C 10.07%
Kroger Co/The 4.79%SPY 01/15/2027 33.21 C 6.96%
Chevron Corp 4.75%SPY 12/11/2026 33.1 C 6.40%
DAVITA INC 4.75%SPY 09/10/2027 37.99 C 5.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OMAH and XPAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OMAHXPAYOMAHXPAYOMAHXPAY
3 months+1.7%+2.0%3.7%5.0%−2.4 pts−0.3 pts
6 months+8.8%+17.8%7.7%11.1%+2.8 pts−0.2 pts
1 year+8.8%+15.7%14.4%19.9%+4.9 pts−0.9 pts
Since launch+14.6%+34.7%21.4%37.5%+12.4 pts−2.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OMAH and XPAY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerVistaSharesRoundhill
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkBerkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized15.1%20.8%
Expense ratio0.98%0.49%
Cash paid, 1 year14.4%19.9%
Price change, 1 year−6.3%−5.8%
Total return, 1 year+8.8%+15.7%
Benchmark return, 1 year+3.9%+16.6%
Ahead or behind+4.9 pts−0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age562 days687 days
Net assets$1.1bn$179m

OMAH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.

XPAY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XPAY paid 19.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or XPAY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and XPAY paid 19.9%, so XPAY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or XPAY?
With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and XPAY returned +15.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XPAY returned more.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or XPAY?
OMAH charges 0.98% a year and XPAY charges 0.49%, so XPAY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OMAH against XPAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against XPAY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-xpay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources