Which paid more, OMAH or QXQ?

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and QXQ paid 15.1%, so QXQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or QXQ?

With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +10.9% and QXQ +12.1% over the year to Nov 12, 2026.

Which is cheaper, OMAH or QXQ?

OMAH and QXQ both charge 0.98% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share on X Download as PDF

OMAH vs QXQ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap

+1.2 pts

1 year to Nov 12, 2026: QXQ ahead, total return

Fee gap

0.00 pts

A year: both 0.98%, per filings dated Jan 5, 2026 and Jun 25, 2026

Overlap

–

No book read for both funds

Net flow

–

Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.98% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

OMAH vs QXQ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	OMAH	QXQ
Paid and earned
Measure	OMAH	QXQ
Total return, 1 year	+10.9%	+12.1%
Price change, 1 year	fell 4.6%	fell 4.7%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	OMAH	QXQ
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Measure	OMAH	QXQ
Expense ratio	0.98%	0.98%
Net assets, OMAH as of Nov 10, 2026 and QXQ as of Aug 31, 2026	$1.1bn	$82m
Holdings
Measure	OMAH	QXQ
Holdings in common	not published

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · QXQ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score50.6OMAH52QXQ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 171 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

OMAH 50.6

QXQ 52

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Key numbers

14.4%

OMAH cash paid, 1 year

15.1%

QXQ cash paid, 1 year

+10.9%

OMAH total return, 1 year

+12.1%

QXQ total return, 1 year

OMAH · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 1.1 pts behind SPY

OMAH

+10.9%

SPY

+12.0%

1.1 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.4%, price −4.6%, total +10.9%, SPY +12.0%, −1.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

OMAH

+10.9%

14.4% of it arrived as cash

1.1 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.4%, price −4.6%, total +10.9%, SPY +12.0%, −1.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

OMAH

+10.9%

14.4% as cash

1.1 pts behind SPY

14.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.4%, price −4.6%, total +10.9%, SPY +12.0%, −1.1 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QXQ · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

QXQ

+12.1%

QQQ

+11.3%

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

QXQ over 1 year: paid 15.1%, price −4.7%, total +12.1%, QQQ +11.3%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QXQ

+12.1%

15.1% of it arrived as cash

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

QXQ over 1 year: paid 15.1%, price −4.7%, total +12.1%, QQQ +11.3%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QXQ

+12.1%

15.1% as cash

0.8 pts ahead of QQQ

15.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QXQ over 1 year: paid 15.1%, price −4.7%, total +12.1%, QQQ +11.3%, +0.8 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying quarterly

Issuer VistaShares SGI

Strategy covered call covered call

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)

Pays monthly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 15.0% 1.0%

Expense ratio 0.98% 0.98%

Cash paid, 1 year 14.4% 15.1%

Price change, 1 year −4.6% −4.7%

Total return, 1 year +10.9% +12.1%

Benchmark return, 1 year +12.0% +11.3%

Ahead or behind −1.1 pts +0.8 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 100% not published

Age 1.7 years 2.4 years

Net assets, OMAH as of Nov 10, 2026 and QXQ as of Aug 31, 2026 $1.1bn $82m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: OMAH vs QXQ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	OMAH	QXQ	OMAH	QXQ	OMAH	QXQ
3 months	+2.8%	−5.4%	3.7%	0.2%	+5.2 pts	+0.5 pts
6 months	+5.3%	−3.8%	7.4%	0.5%	+3.6 pts	+0.4 pts
1 year	+10.9%	+12.1%	14.4%	15.1%	−1.1 pts	+0.8 pts
Since launchNot the same days: OMAH Mar 2025 · QXQ Jun 2024	+18.6%	+47.7%	23.7%	22.8%	−13.8 pts	+2.2 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

OMAH

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

QXQ

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QXQ paid 15.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 1.0%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OMAH or QXQ?: Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and QXQ paid 15.1%, so QXQ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or QXQ?: With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +10.9% and QXQ +12.1% over the year to Nov 12, 2026.
Which is cheaper, OMAH or QXQ?: OMAH and QXQ both charge 0.98% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

OMAH vs QRMI OMAH vs QQQI OMAH vs QLDY OMAH vs BALQ QXQ vs ROCY QXQ vs BALI QXQ vs FTHI QXQ vs DUBS

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →OMAH on its own →QXQ on its own →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →QXQ dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

VistaShares page for OMAH ↗

QXQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

QXQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

SGI website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OMAH against QXQ, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qxq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

Net assets: $1.1bn on Nov 10, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF, and $82m on Aug 31, 2026 for SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF.

OMAH on its own →QXQ on its own →

Growth of 100

OMAH and QXQ

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.

OMAH +10.9%QXQ +12.1%

Nov 12, 2025Nov 12, 2026

OMAH +10.9%, QXQ +12.1%: QXQ +1.2 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.