Data as of .
NUKX vs XLFI: which paid, and which earned it?
NUKX and XLFI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NUKX and XLFI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NUKX | Only in XLFI |
|---|---|
| Global X Uranium ETF 20.16% | STATE STREET FINANCIAL SELECT 99.95% |
| NextEra Energy Inc 7.66% | SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.48% |
| Dominion Energy Inc 7.42% | STATE STREET FINANCIAL SELECT OCT26 59 C -0.01% |
| Centrus Energy Corp 7.37% | STATE STREET FINANCIAL SELECT OCT26 58 C -0.42% |
| Lightbridge Corp 7.26% | |
| Duke Energy Corp 7.14% | |
| Constellation Energy Corp 6.92% | |
| Uranium Energy Corp 6.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUKX | XLFI | NUKX | XLFI | NUKX | XLFI | |
| 3 months | −19.7% | +5.1% | 2.6% | 2.4% | −6.8 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | −15.3% | +12.6% | 6.4% | 5.5% | −5.0 pts | −2.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.2% | not published | 10.9% | not published | +0.4 pts |
| Since launch | −25.6% | +8.7% | 6.3% | 12.4% | −5.7 pts | +1.0 pts |
| NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF Option income on URA, paying weekly | XLFI State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF Covered call on XLF, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Nicholas | State Street |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy | Financials sector (XLF) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 13.1% | 6.7% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.3% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | 10.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −30.8% | −6.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.6% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | +5.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −19.9% | +4.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.7 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 199 days | 415 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $10m |
NUKX in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, NUKX paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.6%. Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy returned −19.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid weekly.
XLFI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLFI paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.2%. Financials sector (XLF) returned +4.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, NUKX or XLFI?
- NUKX charges 1.07% a year and XLFI charges 0.35%, so XLFI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NUKX against XLFI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nukx-vs-xlfi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.