Data as of .
NUKX vs TYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
NUKX and TYLG both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NUKX and TYLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NUKX | Only in TYLG |
|---|---|
| Global X Uranium ETF 20.16% | STATE STREET TECHNOLOGY SELECT SECTOR SP 54.45% |
| NextEra Energy Inc 7.66% | NVIDIA CORP 7.30% |
| Dominion Energy Inc 7.42% | APPLE INC 6.66% |
| Centrus Energy Corp 7.37% | MICROSOFT CORP 4.98% |
| Lightbridge Corp 7.26% | BROADCOM INC 2.30% |
| Duke Energy Corp 7.14% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.24% |
| Constellation Energy Corp 6.92% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.06% |
| Uranium Energy Corp 6.88% | INTEL CORP 1.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUKX | TYLG | NUKX | TYLG | NUKX | TYLG | |
| 3 months | −19.7% | +2.0% | 2.6% | 2.4% | −6.8 pts | +2.9 pts |
| 6 months | −15.3% | +29.6% | 6.4% | 5.7% | −5.0 pts | −10.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +32.9% | not published | 10.3% | not published | −5.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +95.0% | not published | 34.2% | not published | −33.0 pts |
| Since launch | −25.6% | +141.1% | 6.3% | 45.8% | −5.7 pts | −51.3 pts |
| NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF Option income on URA, paying weekly | TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on XLK, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Nicholas | Global X |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy | Technology sector (XLK) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 13.1% | 7.8% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.3% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | 10.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | −30.8% | +20.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.6% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | +32.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −19.9% | +38.0% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.7 pts | −5.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 199 days | 1396 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $15m |
NUKX in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, NUKX paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.6%. Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy returned −19.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid weekly.
TYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.9%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, NUKX or TYLG?
- NUKX charges 1.07% a year and TYLG charges 0.60%, so TYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NUKX against TYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nukx-vs-tylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.