Data as of .
NUKX vs TECY: which paid, and which earned it?
NUKX and TECY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NUKX and TECY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NUKX | Only in TECY |
|---|---|
| Global X Uranium ETF 20.16% | Treasury Bill 100.00% |
| NextEra Energy Inc 7.66% | |
| Dominion Energy Inc 7.42% | |
| Centrus Energy Corp 7.37% | |
| Lightbridge Corp 7.26% | |
| Duke Energy Corp 7.14% | |
| Constellation Energy Corp 6.92% | |
| Uranium Energy Corp 6.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUKX | TECY | NUKX | TECY | NUKX | TECY | |
| 3 months | −19.7% | +0.6% | 2.6% | 11.2% | −6.8 pts | +1.4 pts |
| 6 months | −15.3% | not published | 6.4% | not published | −5.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −25.6% | +0.9% | 6.3% | 17.0% | −5.7 pts | −13.7 pts |
| NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF Option income on URA, paying weekly | TECY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Technology ETF Synthetic covered call on XLK, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Nicholas | GraniteShares |
| Strategy | option income | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy | Technology sector (XLK) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 13.1% | 39.0% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.3% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | 17.0% (since launch on May 5, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −30.8% | −16.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.6% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | +0.9% (since launch on May 5, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −19.9% | +14.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.7 pts | −13.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 50% |
| Age | 199 days | 136 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $1m |
NUKX in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, NUKX paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.6%. Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy returned −19.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid weekly.
TECY in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 5, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TECY paid 17.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.9%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +14.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 39.0%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 50% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, NUKX or TECY?
- NUKX charges 1.07% a year and TECY charges 1.07%, so NUKX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NUKX against TECY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nukx-vs-tecy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.