Data as of .
NUKX vs XLSI: which paid, and which earned it?
NUKX and XLSI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NUKX and XLSI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in NUKX | Only in XLSI |
|---|---|
| Global X Uranium ETF 20.16% | STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES 99.85% |
| NextEra Energy Inc 7.66% | SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.75% |
| Dominion Energy Inc 7.42% | US DOLLAR 0.07% |
| Centrus Energy Corp 7.37% | STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 86 C -0.17% |
| Lightbridge Corp 7.26% | STATE STREET CONSUMER STAPLES OCT26 85 C -0.50% |
| Duke Energy Corp 7.14% | |
| Constellation Energy Corp 6.92% | |
| Uranium Energy Corp 6.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 17, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NUKX | XLSI | NUKX | XLSI | NUKX | XLSI | |
| 3 months | −19.7% | +1.2% | 2.6% | 3.1% | −6.8 pts | +6.3 pts |
| 6 months | −15.3% | +4.9% | 6.4% | 6.2% | −5.0 pts | +1.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.5% | not published | 11.8% | not published | +12.5 pts |
| Since launch | −25.6% | +4.8% | 6.3% | 12.7% | −5.7 pts | +4.5 pts |
| NUKX Nicholas Nuclear Income ETF Option income on URA, paying weekly | XLSI State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF Covered call on XLY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Nicholas | State Street |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy | Consumer discretionary (XLY) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 13.1% | 9.3% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.3% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −30.8% | −6.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −25.6% (since launch on Mar 3, 2026) | +5.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −19.9% | −6.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.7 pts | +12.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 199 days | 415 days |
| Net assets | $2m | $18m |
NUKX in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, NUKX paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −25.6%. Uranium and nuclear (URA), used as the proxy returned −19.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.1%, paid weekly.
XLSI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLSI paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.5%. Consumer discretionary (XLY) returned −6.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, NUKX or XLSI?
- NUKX charges 1.07% a year and XLSI charges 0.35%, so XLSI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NUKX against XLSI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nukx-vs-xlsi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.