Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MSFO vs OARK: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year OARK paid 38.6% of its price in cash against MSFO’s 28.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

28.6%MSFO cash paid, 1 year
38.6%OARK cash paid, 1 year
+1.5%MSFO total return, 1 year
+7.2%OARK total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: MSFO scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

MSFO 69.7OARK 11.29.1, the lowest in this set97.6, the highest

A percentile among the 61 income ETFs writing on a single company. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MSFO1.8 pts ahead of MSFT · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
MSFT−0.3%MSFO+1.5%1.8 pts ahead of MSFTTotal return, distributions reinvestedMSFT−0.3%MSFO+1.5%1.8 pts ahead of MSFT
OARK15.8 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%38.6% as cash15.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%15.8 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MSFO and OARK hold 88% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions MSFO and OARK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingMSFOOARK
TREASURY BILL31.42%37.81%
TREASURY BILL32.44%30.32%
TREASURY BILL14.95%18.55%
TREASURY BILL8.72%10.80%
TREASURY BILL12.47%2.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

MSFO and OARK over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
MSFOOARKMSFOOARKMSFOOARK
3 months+22.9%+5.1%11.8%9.6%−4.2 pts+5.9 pts
6 months+21.4%+15.3%21.0%22.6%−4.5 pts−5.4 pts
1 year+1.5%+7.2%28.6%38.6%+1.8 pts−15.8 pts
3 years+50.9%+48.6%79.0%82.9%−1.9 pts−46.5 pts
Since launch+55.4%+53.5%81.3%89.2%−1.6 pts−99.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSFO and OARK on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSFO
YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on MSFT, paying weekly
OARK
YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkMicrosoft (MSFT)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized26.1%37.1%
Expense ratio1.03%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year28.6%38.6%
Price change, 1 year−29.8%−33.3%
Total return, 1 year+1.5%+7.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.3%+23.0%
Ahead or behind+1.8 pts−15.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate92%39%
Age1113 days1388 days

MSFO in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, MSFO paid 28.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.5%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −0.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MSFO or OARK?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, MSFO paid 28.6% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 38.6%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSFO or OARK?
With every distribution reinvested, MSFO returned +1.5% and OARK returned +7.2% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so OARK returned more.
Which is cheaper, MSFO or OARK?
MSFO charges 1.03% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSFO against OARK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSFO against OARK, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msfo-vs-oark Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources