MSFO vs MSFY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year MSFO paid 27.6% of its price in cash against MSFY’s 16.3%, and returned more with it reinvested. YieldMax(R) MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft (MSFT) ETF.
MSFY costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.0 points; MSFO is 7.1 times larger.
| MSFO | MSFY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 1.03% | 0.99% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $85m | $12m |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.6% | −3.4% |
| What it tracks | MSFT | MSFT |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 28.4% | fell 21.3% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 83% of the Aug 13, 2026 payment | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
About even with MSFT
MSFO over 1 year: paid 27.6%, price −28.4%, total +3.6%, MSFT +3.3%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
MSFT
+3.3%
MSFO
+3.6%
27.6% of it arrived as cash
about even with MSFT
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with MSFT
MSFO over 1 year: paid 27.6%, price −28.4%, total +3.6%, MSFT +3.3%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
MSFT
+3.3%
MSFO
+3.6%
about even with MSFT
27.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MSFO over 1 year: paid 27.6%, price −28.4%, total +3.6%, MSFT +3.3%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
6.6 pts behind MSFT
MSFY over 1 year: paid 16.3%, price −21.3%, total −3.4%, MSFT +3.3%, −6.6 pts. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
MSFT
+3.3%
MSFY
−3.4%
6.6 pts behind MSFT
Total return, distributions reinvested
6.6 pts behind MSFT
MSFY over 1 year: paid 16.3%, price −21.3%, total −3.4%, MSFT +3.3%, −6.6 pts. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
MSFT
+3.3%
MSFY
−3.4%
6.6 pts behind MSFT
16.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MSFY over 1 year: paid 16.3%, price −21.3%, total −3.4%, MSFT +3.3%, −6.6 pts. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
A percentile among the 68 income ETFs writing on a single company. All income ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MSFO and MSFY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | MSFO | MSFY | MSFO | MSFY | MSFO | MSFY |
| 3 months | +32.3% | +32.6% | 12.3% | 3.5% | −6.9 pts | −6.7 pts |
| 6 months | +35.2% | +36.5% | 21.9% | 7.0% | −9.7 pts | −8.4 pts |
| 1 year | +3.6% | −3.4% | 27.6% | 16.3% | +0.4 pts | −6.6 pts |
| 3 years | +60.5% | not published | 80.3% | not published | −6.2 pts | not published |
| Since launch MSFO Aug 2023 · MSFY Nov 2023 | +64.4% | +31.3% | 82.5% | 42.1% | −5.2 pts | −22.3 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSFO in plain words
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026, MSFO paid 27.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.6%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Oct 9, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.4%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Oct 9, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
MSFY in plain words
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026, MSFY paid 16.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.4%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned +3.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.6 pts. At its price on Oct 9, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.0%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Aug 13, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, MSFO against MSFY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msfo-vs-msfy
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MSFO against MSFY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msfo-vs-msfy
[MSFO against MSFY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msfo-vs-msfy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.