Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

MSFO vs NVDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NVDY paid 37.1% of its price in cash against MSFO’s 26.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about MSFO and NVDY

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $100m for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF and $1.3bn for YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF.

At a glance
26.1%
MSFO cash paid, 1 year
37.1%
NVDY cash paid, 1 year
+0.2%
MSFO total return, 1 year
+10.5%
NVDY total return, 1 year
MSFO · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 1.4 pts ahead of MSFT
MSFO
+0.2%
MSFT
−1.2%

1.4 pts ahead of MSFT

MSFO over 1 year: paid 26.1%, price −30.2%, total +0.2%, MSFT −1.2%, +1.4 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

MSFT

−1.2%

MSFO

+0.2%

1.4 pts ahead of MSFT

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of MSFT

MSFO over 1 year: paid 26.1%, price −30.2%, total +0.2%, MSFT −1.2%, +1.4 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

MSFT

−1.2%

MSFO

+0.2%

1.4 pts ahead of MSFT

26.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MSFO over 1 year: paid 26.1%, price −30.2%, total +0.2%, MSFT −1.2%, +1.4 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
NVDY · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 3.1 pts ahead of NVDA
NVDY
+10.5%
NVDA
+7.4%

3.1 pts ahead of NVDA

NVDY over 1 year: paid 37.1%, price −29.9%, total +10.5%, NVDA +7.4%, +3.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

NVDA

+7.4%

NVDY

+10.5%

37.1% of it arrived as cash

3.1 pts ahead of NVDA

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.1 pts ahead of NVDA

NVDY over 1 year: paid 37.1%, price −29.9%, total +10.5%, NVDA +7.4%, +3.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

NVDA

+7.4%

NVDY

+10.5%

37.1% as cash

3.1 pts ahead of NVDA

37.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. NVDY over 1 year: paid 37.1%, price −29.9%, total +10.5%, NVDA +7.4%, +3.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

MSFO costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.3 points; NVDY is 13.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MSFO vs NVDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMSFONVDY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+0.2%+10.5%
Price change, 1 yearfell 30.2%fell 29.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate89% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkMicrosoft (MSFT)NVIDIA (NVDA)
Cost and size
Expense ratio1.03%1.09%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$100m$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · NVDY scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score61.5MSFO75NVDY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 74 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.7, the lowest in this set 99.3, the highest

A percentile among the 74 income ETFs writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 28, 2026. Method

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, MSFO and NVDY hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first MSFO NVDY
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 25.91% 18.49%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 13.60% 19.44%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in MSFO
MSFT 11/20/2026 480.01 C 11.13%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C535 1.14%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C530 0.73%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C532.5 0.70%
MSFT 11/20/2026 480.01 P -0.54%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C522.5 -1.01%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C520 -1.02%
MSFT US 10/30/26 C525 -1.64%
Only in NVDY
NVDA US 11/20/26 C210 6.10%
NVDA US 10/30/26 C220 0.22%
2NVDA US 11/20/26 C210.01 FLX 0.08%
NVDA US 10/30/26 C225 0.06%
NVDA US 10/30/26 C217.5 -0.48%
NVDA US 10/30/26 C215 -0.67%
2NVDA US 11/20/26 P210.01 FLX -3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on MSFT, paying weekly NVDY YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on NVDA, paying weekly
Strategy synthetic covered call synthetic covered call
Benchmark Microsoft (MSFT) NVIDIA (NVDA)
Pays weekly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 34.0% 25.2%
Expense ratio 1.03% 1.09%
Cash paid, 1 year 26.1% 37.1%
Price change, 1 year −30.2% −29.9%
Total return, 1 year +0.2% +10.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.2% +7.4%
Ahead or behind +1.4 pts +3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 89% not published
Age 3.2 years 3.5 years
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $100m $1.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MSFO vs NVDY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMSFONVDYMSFONVDYMSFONVDY
3 months+31.5%+12.1%12.5%10.5%−4.8 pts−1.4 pts
6 months+20.2%+2.9%19.5%19.8%−5.4 pts−0.3 pts
1 year+0.2%+10.5%26.1%37.1%+1.5 pts+3.1 pts
3 years+57.1%+272.2%79.1%185.7%−7.7 pts−161.1 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MSFO Aug 2023 · NVDY May 2023+64.8%+350.1%83.2%208.2%−3.4 pts−306.0 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-AFBEA085B9

MSFO and NVDY are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. MSFO paid 26.1% and NVDY 37.1% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 11.0 points.
  2. What each is measured against. MSFO is measured against Microsoft (MSFT) and NVDY against NVIDIA (NVDA).
  3. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 28, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

MSFO and NVDY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MSFO

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO paid 26.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 30.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.2%. Microsoft (MSFT) returned −1.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 34.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 89% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

NVDY

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NVDY paid 37.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 29.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.5%. NVIDIA (NVDA) returned +7.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, MSFO or NVDY?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, MSFO paid 26.1% of its starting price in cash and NVDY paid 37.1%, so NVDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, MSFO or NVDY?
With every distribution reinvested, MSFO returned +0.2% and NVDY +10.5% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, MSFO or NVDY?
MSFO charges 1.03% a year and NVDY charges 1.09%, so MSFO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MSFO against NVDY, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/msfo-vs-nvdy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.