Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

OARK vs TSLY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year TSLY paid 53.2% of its price in cash against OARK’s 38.6%, though OARK returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF and YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

38.6%OARK cash paid, 1 year
53.2%TSLY cash paid, 1 year
+7.2%OARK total return, 1 year
+3.9%TSLY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: TSLY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

OARK 11.2TSLY 69.73.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

OARK15.8 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%38.6% as cash15.8 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+23.0%OARK+7.2%15.8 pts behind QQQ
TSLY4.8 pts ahead of TSLA · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA−0.9%TSLY+3.9%53.2% as cash4.8 pts ahead of TSLATotal return, distributions reinvestedTSLA−0.9%TSLY+3.9%4.8 pts ahead of TSLA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OARK and TSLY hold 77% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions OARK and TSLY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingOARKTSLY
TREASURY BILL37.81%22.62%
TREASURY BILL30.32%22.39%
TREASURY BILL18.55%20.60%
TREASURY BILL10.80%22.04%
TREASURY BILL2.51%12.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

OARK and TSLY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
OARKTSLYOARKTSLYOARKTSLY
3 months+5.1%−9.9%9.6%10.8%+5.9 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+15.3%−7.9%22.6%22.0%−5.4 pts−1.3 pts
1 year+7.2%+3.9%38.6%53.2%−15.8 pts+4.8 pts
3 years+48.6%+19.4%82.9%83.5%−46.5 pts−17.2 pts
Since launch+53.5%+38.5%89.2%97.1%−99.6 pts−61.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
OARK and TSLY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OARK
YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
TSLY
YieldMax(R) TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on TSLA, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxyTesla (TSLA)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized37.1%50.0%
Expense ratio1.00%1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year38.6%53.2%
Price change, 1 year−33.3%−44.2%
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+3.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+23.0%−0.9%
Ahead or behind−15.8 pts+4.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate39%100%
Age1388 days1388 days

OARK in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +23.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TSLY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, TSLY paid 53.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.9%. Tesla (TSLA) returned −0.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.8 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, OARK or TSLY?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, OARK paid 38.6% of its starting price in cash and TSLY paid 53.2%, so TSLY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or TSLY?
With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +7.2% and TSLY returned +3.9% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so OARK returned more.
Which is cheaper, OARK or TSLY?
OARK charges 1.00% a year and TSLY charges 1.07%, so OARK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

OARK against TSLY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against TSLY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-tsly Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources