Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF
vsOpen in the appaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds

MPIM vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap
+8.2 pts
3 months to Nov 12, 2026: QYLG ahead, total return
Fee gap
0.35 pts
A year: MPIM 0.70%, QYLG 0.35%, per filings dated Feb 26, 2026 and Aug 7, 2026
Overlap
–
No book read for both funds
Net flow
–
Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

QYLG costs 0.35 points a year less.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

MPIM vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureMPIMQYLG
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 yearnot published+13.3%
Price changefell 12.8% (since Aug 12, 2026)fell 4.8% (1 year)
Return of capital, issuer estimate93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Benchmarknot publishedNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 2.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.70%0.35%
Net assetsnot read by ETFIQ$186m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published

Method

Key numbers
3.0%
MPIM cash paid, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
16.6%
QYLG cash paid, 1 year
−10.0%
MPIM total return, since launch, Aug 12, 2026
+13.3%
QYLG total return, 1 year
MPIM · since launch to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured
MPIM
−10.0%
none

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

MPIM

−10.0%

3.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. MPIM since launch: paid 3.0%, price −12.8%, total −10.0%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.
QYLG · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 2 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLG
+13.3%
QQQ
+11.3%

2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.6%, price −4.8%, total +13.3%, QQQ +11.3%, +2.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QYLG

+13.3%

16.6% of it arrived as cash

2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2 pts ahead of QQQ

QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.6%, price −4.8%, total +13.3%, QQQ +11.3%, +2.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

QQQ

+11.3%

QYLG

+13.3%

16.6% cash

2 pts ahead of QQQ

16.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.6%, price −4.8%, total +13.3%, QQQ +11.3%, +2.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

MPIM m+ Income Momentum Autocall ETF · Autocallable QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
Issuer m+ Global X
Strategy autocallable covered call
Benchmark not set Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized 17.0% 7.1%
Expense ratio 0.70% 0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year 3.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) 16.6%
Price change, 1 year −12.8% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) −4.8%
Total return, 1 year −10.0% (since launch, Aug 12, 2026) +13.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year not published +11.3%
Ahead or behind not available +2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 93%
Age 92 days 6.1 years
Net assets not read by ETFIQ $186m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: MPIM vs QYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowMPIMQYLGMPIMQYLGMPIMQYLG
3 months−10.6%−2.4%3.0%1.6%not measured+3.5 pts
6 months–0.0%–3.9%–+4.2 pts
1 year–+13.3%–16.6%–+2.0 pts
3 years–+68.3%–51.2%–−17.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: MPIM Aug 2026 · QYLG Sep 2020−10.0%+115.4%3.0%76.4%not measured−46.2 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

QYLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
MPIM

Over the period from its first trade on Aug 12, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, MPIM paid 3.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −10.0%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.0%, paid periodically.

QYLG

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, QYLG paid 16.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.0 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, MPIM or QYLG?
MPIM charges 0.70% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so QYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MPIM against QYLG, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/mpim-vs-qylg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

MPIM and QYLG both write options for income.

Growth of 100

MPIM and QYLG

Total return, distributions reinvested, 3 months.

MPIM −10.6%QYLG −2.4%
Aug 13, 2026Nov 12, 2026

MPIM −10.6%, QYLG −2.4%: QYLG +8.2 pts ahead, 3 months, Aug 13, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026.