Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PCOV vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?

PCOV and QYLG both write options for income.

Principal Equity Premium Income ETF and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF.

0.0%PCOV cash paid, 1 year
17.4%QYLG cash paid, 1 year
−3.7%PCOV total return, 1 year
+22.2%QYLG total return, 1 year
PCOV3 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−0.7%PCOV−3.7%3 pts behind SPY
QYLGAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QYLG+22.2%17.4% as cashabout even with QQQ

Performance, window by window

PCOV and QYLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
PCOVQYLGPCOVQYLGPCOVQYLG
3 monthsnot published−0.1%not published2.1%not published+2.4 pts
6 monthsnot published+19.6%not published4.6%not published−4.7 pts
1 yearnot published+22.2%not published17.4%not published+0.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+76.2%not published51.1%not published−22.0 pts
Since launch−3.7%+122.0%0.0%75.3%−3.0 pts−52.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PCOV and QYLG on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PCOV
Principal Equity Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY
QYLG
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerPrincipalGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysnot establishedmonthly
Payout rate, annualizednot published6.8%
Expense ratio0.34%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)17.4%
Price change, 1 year−3.7%+2.4%
Total return, 1 year−3.7% (since launch on Aug 19, 2026)+22.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year−0.7%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−3.0 pts+0.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published96%
Age30 days2187 days
Net assetsnot published$175m

PCOV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, PCOV paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −0.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts.

QYLG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, PCOV or QYLG?
PCOV charges 0.34% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so PCOV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PCOV against QYLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PCOV against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pcov-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources