Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
QYLG vs ROCQ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
QYLG and ROCQ both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about QYLG and ROCQ
Net assets: $183m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $770m on Nov 3, 2026 for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF.
2.1 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QYLG
+14.4%
16.7% of it arrived as cash
2.1 pts ahead of QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.1 pts ahead of QQQ
QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QYLG
+14.4%
16.7% as cash
2.1 pts ahead of QQQ
16.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. QYLG over 1 year: paid 16.7%, price −3.9%, total +14.4%, QQQ +12.3%, +2.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.5.2 pts behind QQQ
ROCQ since launch: paid 7.8%, price +4.3%, total +11.9%, QQQ +17.1%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+17.1%
ROCQ
+11.9%
7.8% of it arrived as cash
5.2 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.2 pts behind QQQ
ROCQ since launch: paid 7.8%, price +4.3%, total +11.9%, QQQ +17.1%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+17.1%
ROCQ
+11.9%
5.2 pts behind QQQ
7.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. ROCQ since launch: paid 7.8%, price +4.3%, total +11.9%, QQQ +17.1%, −5.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.35% a year; ROCQ is 4.0 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | QYLG | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.4% | not published |
| Price change | fell 3.9% (1 year) | rose 4.3% (since Mar 19, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 93% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $183m | $731m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 64% | |
Risk and return
Mar 27, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 31 weekly returnsFrom Mar 2026 to Oct 2026, QYLG returned more: +19.0% to +16.8%. QYLG fell less at its worst: −5.8% to −7.1%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | QYLG | ROCQ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +19.0% | +16.8% | QYLG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | +13.8% | +10.0% | QYLG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −5.8% | −7.1% | QYLG | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 31 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, QYLG and ROCQ hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
64% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | QYLG | ROCQ | QYLG | ROCQ | QYLG | ROCQ |
| 3 months | −0.8% | −3.5% | 1.6% | 2.7% | +2.6 pts | −0.1 pts |
| 6 months | +2.5% | −1.2% | 4.0% | 5.8% | +2.8 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 1 year | +14.4% | – | 16.7% | – | +2.1 pts | – |
| 3 years | +72.0% | – | 52.1% | – | −19.4 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: QYLG Sep 2020 · ROCQ Mar 2026 | +116.2% | +11.9% | 76.4% | 7.8% | −46.8 pts | −5.2 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for ROCQ.
QYLG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QYLG paid 16.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 93% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
ROCQ
Over the period from its first trade on Mar 19, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ROCQ paid 7.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.6%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QYLG against ROCQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-rocq
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). QYLG against ROCQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-rocq
[QYLG against ROCQ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qylg-vs-rocq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.