Data as of .
MAGY vs ROCY: which paid, and which earned it?
MAGY and ROCY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and ROCY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGY | Only in ROCY |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% | NVIDIA Corp. 8.37% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% | Apple, Inc. 6.71% |
| MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% | Alphabet, Inc. 5.33% |
| Microsoft Corp. 4.97% | |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.15% | |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 3.00% | |
| Broadcom, Inc. 2.61% | |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.43% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGY | ROCY | MAGY | ROCY | MAGY | ROCY | |
| 3 months | +3.7% | +2.6% | 6.1% | 1.7% | −3.9 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +14.8% | 12.9% | 3.7% | −12.7 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 1 year | +1.8% | not published | 26.5% | not published | −9.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +25.6% | +13.5% | 42.0% | 3.6% | −37.5 pts | −2.9 pts |
| MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.2% | 5.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.5% | 3.6% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −25.3% | +9.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +13.5% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.2% | +16.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.4 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 513 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $102m | $726m |
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
ROCY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCY paid 3.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, MAGY or ROCY?
- MAGY charges 0.99% a year and ROCY charges 0.35%, so ROCY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against ROCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-rocy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.