Data as of .
MAGY vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against OMAH’s 14.4%, though OMAH returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGY and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in MAGY | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% | Apple Inc 10.59% |
| First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAGY | OMAH | MAGY | OMAH | MAGY | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +3.7% | +1.7% | 6.1% | 3.7% | −3.9 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +8.1% | +8.8% | 12.9% | 7.7% | −12.7 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +1.8% | +8.8% | 26.5% | 14.4% | −9.4 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +25.6% | +14.6% | 42.0% | 21.4% | −37.5 pts | +12.4 pts |
| MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 19.2% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 26.5% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −25.3% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +1.8% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +11.2% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.4 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 513 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $102m | $1.1bn |
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, MAGY or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, MAGY or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, MAGY returned +1.8% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OMAH returned more.
- Which is cheaper, MAGY or OMAH?
- MAGY charges 0.99% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MAGY against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/magy-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.